CNN Host Highlights What Maine Dems Are Bracing for Regarding Graham Platner
Meet the Pair of Socialists Who Recruited Graham Platner. You Can See How...
JD Vance Just Took Huge Action Against Tim Walz and Keith Ellison
You Won't Believe What This Former Platner Staffer Said About His Campaign
Alaska's Democratic 'Decoy' Senate Candidate's Son's Suspicious Ties Just Got Exposed
This Intruder Broke Into an Armed Homeowner's Residence and Immediately Regretted It
This GOP Holdout Is Now on Board With the SAVE America Act
Embedded Evil
Qintel Puts Pittsburgh on the Map for Cyber Intelligence
This Is What AOC Has to Say About Graham Platner's Abuse Allegations
Here's the Real Problem With California's Elections
Roy Cooper Is Blaming Washington DC for Rising Energy Costs. His Own Record...
The SPLC Is Being Grilled on Capitol Hill—Watch Jim Jordan Accuse Them of...
Seattle Schools Are Hiding Children's 'Gender Identity' Changes From Parents, and It's Leg...
Trump Vows Response to Iran Shooting Down American Helicopter
Tipsheet

Bordering on Journalistic Malpractice

Bordering on Journalistic Malpractice
If The New York Times is going to promote this story -- that Freddie Mac paid McCain advisor Rick Davis' firm through last month -- it would seem appropriate to include two important facts that the Times "conveniently" left out.
Advertisement


(1) If the lobbying payments were intended to help Freddie Mac cozy up to John McCain himself, they were a dismal failure.

Here is the page from the Congressional Record on May 25, 2006 where John McCain actually expresses concern about "the regulatory structure that governs Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac" and "the role they play in the housing market."  Read it for yourself.

(2) Rick Davis has not received any compensation from his firm since he left in 2006.

In light of these facts, it really borders on journalistic malpractice for the Times to run a big story headlined "McCain's Aide's Firm Was Paid by Freddie Mac."  The clear implication -- contrary to fact -- is that McCain and/or his aide somehow profited from the now-discredited organization.

As the McCain campaign has pointed out, we're still waiting for any Times scrutiny of Obama aide David Axelrod's clients, contacts and associations.  But don't hold your breath -- after all, it's the New York Times.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos