A Few Simple Snarky Rules to Make Life Better
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 306: ‘Fear Not' Old Testament – Part 2
The War on Warring
No Sanctuary in the Sanctuary
Chromosomes Matter — and Women’s Sports Prove It
The Economy Will Decide Congress — If Republicans Actually Talk About It
The Real United States of America
These Athletes Are Getting Paid to Shame Their Own Country at the Olympics
WaPo CEO Resigns Days After Laying Off 300 Employees
Georgia's Jon Ossoff Says Trump Administration Imitates Rhetoric of 'History's Worst Regim...
U.S. Thwarts $4 Million Weapons Plot Aimed at Toppling South Sudan Government
Minnesota Mom, Daughter, and Relative Allegedly Stole $325k from SNAP
Michigan AG: Detroit Man Stole 12 Identities to Collect Over $400,000 in Public...
Does Maxine Waters Really Think Trump Will Be Bothered by Her Latest Tantrum?
Fifth Circuit Rules That Some Illegal Aliens Can Be Detained Without Bond Until...
Tipsheet

A Quarrel of Style Over Substance

Matt notes below  (as does Kathryn Jean Lopez at NRO) that a public kerfuffle with Jesse Jackson can only help Barack among mainstream voters.

That's true, of course.  But my thought is that it doesn't really provide him with anything approaching a Sister Souljah moment because the whole country knows enough about Jesse Jackson to realize that he's probably been driven insane with jealousy by Barack Obama's political success.  And, of course, he's desperately trying to remain relevant.
Advertisement


What's more, when it comes to a policy issue -- any policy issue -- can anyone identify somewhere that Barack is demonstrably to the right of Jesse Jackson?  Not rhetorically, because words can be cheap . . .but really, when it comes to voting.  Is there any area (aside, of course, from his recent flips toward the center like today's FISA vote) in Barack's voting history with which Jesse Jackson or others who, like him, are on the left of the Democratic Party could take issue?

In fact, if Kathryn's report is accurate, Jackson isn't trashing Barack for any of his policies or his record . . . it's just about rhetoric, and where the rhetorical emphasis should lie when it comes to discussing the responsibility for the plight of some African Americans.  Sounds to me like a matter of style over substance.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement