If Columbia University's President Considers This a Form of Protesting, The Terror Camp...
Former Rolling Stone Editor's Biting Attack on the NYT's 'Adults' Piece About Speaker...
The Left Gets Its Own Charlottesville
Pro-Hamas Activists March on NYPD HQ After Police Dismantled NYU's Pro-Hamas Camp
A Girl Went to Wendy's and Ended Up With Permanent Brain Damage
Democrats Are Going to Get Someone Killed and They’re Perfectly Fine With It
Postcards From the Edge of Cannibalism
Why Small Businesses Hate Bidenomics
The Empire Begins to Strike Back
The Empires Begin to Strike Back
With Cigarette Sales Declining, More Evidence Supports the Role of Flavored Vapes in...
To Defend Free Speech, the Senate Should Reject the TikTok Ban
Congress Should Not Pass DJI Drone Ban Legislation
Republican Jewish Coalition Endorses Bob Good's Primary Opponent Due to Vote Against Aid...
Here's What Kathy Hochul, Chuck Schumer Are Saying About Columbia University's Pro-Hamas P...
Tipsheet

A Quarrel of Style Over Substance

Matt notes below  (as does Kathryn Jean Lopez at NRO) that a public kerfuffle with Jesse Jackson can only help Barack among mainstream voters.

That's true, of course.  But my thought is that it doesn't really provide him with anything approaching a Sister Souljah moment because the whole country knows enough about Jesse Jackson to realize that he's probably been driven insane with jealousy by Barack Obama's political success.  And, of course, he's desperately trying to remain relevant.
Advertisement


What's more, when it comes to a policy issue -- any policy issue -- can anyone identify somewhere that Barack is demonstrably to the right of Jesse Jackson?  Not rhetorically, because words can be cheap . . .but really, when it comes to voting.  Is there any area (aside, of course, from his recent flips toward the center like today's FISA vote) in Barack's voting history with which Jesse Jackson or others who, like him, are on the left of the Democratic Party could take issue?

In fact, if Kathryn's report is accurate, Jackson isn't trashing Barack for any of his policies or his record . . . it's just about rhetoric, and where the rhetorical emphasis should lie when it comes to discussing the responsibility for the plight of some African Americans.  Sounds to me like a matter of style over substance.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement