Over 800 Google Workers Demand the Company Cut Ties With ICE
UNL Student Government Passes SJP-Backed Israel Divestment Resolution
AOC Mourns the Loss of ’Our Media,’ More Layoffs Across the Industry (and...
The Left Just Doesn't Understand Why WaPo Is Failing
16 Years and $16 Billion Later the First Railhead Goes Down for CA's...
New Musical Remakes Anne Frank As a Genderqueer Hip-Hop Star
Toledo Man Indicted for Threatening to Kill Vice President JD Vance During Ohio...
Fort Lauderdale Financial Advisor Sentenced to 20 Years for $94M International Ponzi Schem...
FCC Is Reportedly Investigating The View
Illegal Immigrant Allegedly Used Stolen Identity to Vote and Collect $400K in Federal...
$26 Billion Gone: Stellantis Joins Automakers Retreating From EVs
House Oversight Chair: Clintons Don’t Get Special Treatment in Epstein Probe
Utah Man Sentenced for Stealing Funds Meant to Aid Ukrainian First Responders
Ex-Bank Employee Pleads Guilty to Laundering $8M for Overseas Criminal Organization
State Department Orders Evacuation of US Citizens in Iran As Possibility of Military...
Tipsheet

You Gotta Have Faith? Or Not?

In a move no doubt intended to signal his friendliness to people of faith (!), Barack Obama announced, according to this AP story:

plans to expand President Bush's program steering federal social service dollars to religious groups and -- in a move sure to cause controversy -- support some ability to hire and fire based on faith.

Advertisement
But wait a minute.  If this First Read account is accurate (and there's every reason to believe it is), Barack is flipping yet again

The original version of the AP story said Barack would "support their [i.e. the religious groups'] ability to hire and fire based on faith."  The Obama campaign said that characterization was inaccurate, so AP changed "their" to "some" ability . . .

But the campaign is still saying that the statement is inaccurate.

So which is it?  Does Barack support religious groups having the ability/some ability/any ability to hire and fire based on faith -- as the AP has reported -- or not?

Perhaps he simultaneously supports and opposes it, a la his position(s) on gay marriage and the DC gun ban?  Wow!  The options are endless!

It seems increasingly apparent that he's the candidate of "change" all right -- changing views, that is.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement