Where the Hell Is Merrick Garland?
LSU Fraternities Had Enough of the Pro-Hamas Clowns Invading Their Campus
The Cops Are Finally Unloading on the Commies and Normal People Are Fed...
Another Arab Country Rejects Hosting Hamas Terrorist Leaders
UPDATED: Democrat Rep. Henry Cuellar Indicted on Federal Bribery Charges
The All-Hollywood Distemper Edition: Biden's Election Desperation Seen By the Celebrity Me...
A Troubling Tale
NYPD Reveals Details About the 'Professional' Pro-Hamas Agitators Popping Up on Campuses
Liberal Reporter Triggered by Frat Boys Counterprotesting Hamas Agitators, Calls Them 'Rac...
Columbia President Breaks Overdue Silence Amid Pro-Hamas Protests
Illegal Immigrants Ambush Michigan State Capitol to Demand Driver Licenses
Trump Narrows His VP List Down to These Four Potential Candidates
Supposedly 'Devout Catholic' President Biden Won't Be Too Happy With These Poll Results
Watch: WH Declines to Deny Leaked Proposal to Bring Gaza 'Refugees' to US
Biden Admin Finally Acknowledges What's Happening With Gaza Aid
Tipsheet

Who's "Fallen" -- and How Far?

Ooooohhhhh . . . Arianna Huffington is claiming that John and Cindy McCain told her at a dinner party in 2000 that they didn't vote for George Bush.  Again,
Advertisement
oooohhhhhh.

So why, exactly, are we supposed to care?  Everyone knows that McCain was something of a sore loser in 2000.  It's not the most charming part of his personality, but it's understandable (it may also be the reason he voted against the President's tax cuts).

Huffington says she's just trying to dramatize "just how far [McCain] has fallen since then in his hunger for the presidency," whatever that means.   What she's really trying to do is exacerbate the conservative right's dislike for McCain.  And come on -- we know that someone in this scenario has a little appetite for the spotlight . . . and I'm not referring to the senator (or his wife).

The episode dramatizes not how far McCain has "fallen," but rather, just how far the one-time Newt Gingrich acolyte is willing to go in order to satiate her appetite for notoriety (and social position in Los Angeles).  If she was enough of a trusted ally just eight years ago that McCain would confide such a thing to her, it's pretty remarkable how far left she's gone, and how fast. 

And -- is this concern quaint? --  it speaks volumes about character that someone would be willing to disclose private conversations in an attempt to damage McCain's candidacy, just because she's shifted from right to left.
Advertisement


Can her recollection be trusted?  Well, no one knows besides Ms. Huffington and Senator and Mrs. McCain.  But it's worth pointing out that it's not hard to "recollect" all kinds of things about people.  Given my acquaintance with Barack, just think about all the colorful conversations I could "recall" in which he told me this, that or the other thing (or worse, if I were inclined to indulge in Anita-Hillian flights of fancy).

McCain's people have denied the story.  It would have been interesting if they had said -- "So what?" and challenged the left to run with this narrative at the same time as they try to paint him as just eight more years of GWB.

Update: Check out comment #4 by One Hot Minute below.  Seems as though there are even more contradictions to Arianna's account.
 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement