A Few Simple Snarky Rules to Make Life Better
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 306: ‘Fear Not' Old Testament – Part 2
The War on Warring
No Sanctuary in the Sanctuary
Chromosomes Matter — and Women’s Sports Prove It
The Economy Will Decide Congress — If Republicans Actually Talk About It
The Real United States of America
These Athletes Are Getting Paid to Shame Their Own Country at the Olympics
WaPo CEO Resigns Days After Laying Off 300 Employees
Georgia's Jon Ossoff Says Trump Administration Imitates Rhetoric of 'History's Worst Regim...
U.S. Thwarts $4 Million Weapons Plot Aimed at Toppling South Sudan Government
Minnesota Mom, Daughter, and Relative Allegedly Stole $325k from SNAP
Michigan AG: Detroit Man Stole 12 Identities to Collect Over $400,000 in Public...
Does Maxine Waters Really Think Trump Will Be Bothered by Her Latest Tantrum?
Fifth Circuit Rules That Some Illegal Aliens Can Be Detained Without Bond Until...
Tipsheet

Forgive My Cynicism . . .

Notwithstanding the news that other candidates' passport files were breached, it would still make sense for the press to dig a bit into the backgrounds and affiliations of the people who were fired for the snooping. 
Advertisement


Jim Geraghty points out (here and here) some interesting coincidences between Clinton campaign (or pro-Clinton) rhetoric and the snooping itself.  Assuming there was any information in the files (or that people believed there might be), wouldn't it make sense for the snoopers to make sure they accessed all three candidates' files, just to cover their partisan tracks in the event of being discovered?

Maybe this really is just a case of isolated snooperism.  But it's worth taking a look.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement