Trump Ramps Up Steel Tariffs After Promise in Pittsburgh
The White House Had a Fitting Post About the Family of Boulder Terrorist...
Ted Cruz Roasts Senator 'Spartacus' During Fiery Exchange About Threats to Judges
CNN Fires Reporter Behind Defamation Report
Federal Court Halts Trump Restrictions on Transgender Inmates
Free Market Credit Card Reform, Tax Cuts Will Deliver Small Business Golden Age
Why People Are Upset Over AOC's Response to the Horrific Boulder Terrorist Attack
NRCC Torches House Dems Over Boulder Terror Attack: Rivet, Landsman Slammed for Radical...
CEO of Health Care Software Company Convicted in $1 Billion Medicare Fraud Scheme
'Lamest Opposition in America': JD Vance Responds to Democrats Trying to Troll Trump...
Male Student 'Switches Gender' During School Day To Watch Girls Change in Locker...
FBI Uncovers Chinese Biopathogen Smuggling Plot at University of Michigan
Californians Eye Kamala Harris 2028 Rumors with Shrugs, Sighs, and Skepticism
Party's Over: Nightclub Full of Illegal Immigrants in South Carolina Raided
WH Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt Calls Out BBC for Libelous Claim About IDF...
Tipsheet

Hey Liberals: Your 'Eco-Friendly' Cars Are Actually Causing More Pollution

So often the left entices their party with "Eco-friendly," science savvy, earth loving phenomenons. However, the National Bureau of Economic Research just found that on a per-mile basis electric cars are on average worse for the environment when compared to their gas-powered friends.

Advertisement

This new study proves that subsidizing these environmental "friendly" cars should be put to a halt.

In monetary terms, electric cars are about half-a-cent worse per mile for the environment than gas-powered cars, on average. This means that if a government wants to tax a car based on how much it pollutes, electric cars should be taxed half of one cent more per mile driven than gasoline cars.

While much is dependent on where exactly the cars are driven, this finding that electric cars are on average half-a-cent worse per mile than gas-powered cars blows out the common assumption that electric cars are the "clean" thing to do.

This past Tuesday the Obama administration gathered to rally support on climate change mainly stressing the impacts of on public health and the shortening of life:

casting "climate change as a moral issue, saying its health effects target society's most vulnerable, including children, the elderly and the poor.

Contrary to Obama's measures is the ever true reality that in purchasing an electric car it actually "makes society as a whole worse off because electric vehicles tend to export air pollution to other states more than gasoline vehicles."

Advertisement

Ironically, in 2008 Obama promoted electric cars by administering "an ambitious goal of putting 1 million advanced technology vehicles on the road by 2015."

With these efforts Obama was trying to reduce oil consumption, however this new study proves that the power for electric cars has a new source of energy that needs tackling: coal.

Although the typical assumption is that electric cars are cleaner than gasoline-fueled cars, the power for electric cars has to come from somewhere, and it's often from coal-fired power plants. "Rather than simply accepting the assertion of environmental benefits from electric vehicle use, this paper conducts a rigorous comparison of the environmental consequences of gasoline and electric powered vehicles, specifically by quantifying the externalities (both greenhouse gases and local air pollution) generated by driving these vehicles," the authors write.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement