You Can't Create a Weirder Candidate to Run Against Than James Talarico
Obama Judge Busted for Having Loud Sex With Police Commander in Her Chambers
Black Judge Suspended for Allegedly Making Racist Comments About White Employee
James Talarico Once Gave an Interesting Invocation Before a Texas Legislative Session
The Media Have Cracked the Case on Who's Paying to Clean Up D.C.
DHS Head Markwayne Mullin Vows Law and Order Will Prevail Against NJ Anti-ICE...
Democrats Are Soft on Crime, but Hard on Law-Abiding Citizens
'We Did Not Vanish.' Greek Media Outlet Slams Christopher Nolan's Diverse 'Odyssey'
Francesca Hong Knows Her Campaign for Governor Is About to Crash and Burn
Even Politico Admits the Democrats' Weaponization Tax Scheme Is Legally Dubious
Spencer Pratt Reacts to Gavin Newsom's Late Endorsement of Karen Bass For LA...
'Pizza to Pews' Event Comes to D.C. As Gen-Z Flocks to Catholicism
Trump Currently in Situation Room Ready to Make Major Iran Decision
Trans Student Protected Over 9-Year-Old Girl by Massachusetts School Principal
Trump Fires Back After Jill Biden's Debate Night 'Stroke' Fears
Tipsheet

Hey Liberals: Your 'Eco-Friendly' Cars Are Actually Causing More Pollution

Hey Liberals: Your 'Eco-Friendly' Cars Are Actually Causing More Pollution

So often the left entices their party with "Eco-friendly," science savvy, earth loving phenomenons. However, the National Bureau of Economic Research just found that on a per-mile basis electric cars are on average worse for the environment when compared to their gas-powered friends.

Advertisement

This new study proves that subsidizing these environmental "friendly" cars should be put to a halt.

In monetary terms, electric cars are about half-a-cent worse per mile for the environment than gas-powered cars, on average. This means that if a government wants to tax a car based on how much it pollutes, electric cars should be taxed half of one cent more per mile driven than gasoline cars.

While much is dependent on where exactly the cars are driven, this finding that electric cars are on average half-a-cent worse per mile than gas-powered cars blows out the common assumption that electric cars are the "clean" thing to do.

This past Tuesday the Obama administration gathered to rally support on climate change mainly stressing the impacts of on public health and the shortening of life:

casting "climate change as a moral issue, saying its health effects target society's most vulnerable, including children, the elderly and the poor.

Contrary to Obama's measures is the ever true reality that in purchasing an electric car it actually "makes society as a whole worse off because electric vehicles tend to export air pollution to other states more than gasoline vehicles."

Advertisement

Ironically, in 2008 Obama promoted electric cars by administering "an ambitious goal of putting 1 million advanced technology vehicles on the road by 2015."

With these efforts Obama was trying to reduce oil consumption, however this new study proves that the power for electric cars has a new source of energy that needs tackling: coal.

Although the typical assumption is that electric cars are cleaner than gasoline-fueled cars, the power for electric cars has to come from somewhere, and it's often from coal-fired power plants. "Rather than simply accepting the assertion of environmental benefits from electric vehicle use, this paper conducts a rigorous comparison of the environmental consequences of gasoline and electric powered vehicles, specifically by quantifying the externalities (both greenhouse gases and local air pollution) generated by driving these vehicles," the authors write.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement