Larry O'Connor, Scott Jennings, Kurt Schlichter. Celebrate America With Us! 🇺🇸
Lenny McAllister on How to Save America
Time Magazine Puts Graham 'Porta Potty' Platner on its Cover Because of Course...
John Fetterman Loses Another Chief of Staff Amid High Turnover
Trouble Is Brewing for Seattle's Mayor After Her Attacks on Starbucks
Aimee Bock, the Woman Behind the 'Feeding Our Future' Fraud Scandal, Was Just...
The DNC 2024 Autopsy Is Here, and It's a Disaster
We're Not Surprised Zohran Mamdani Is Skipping This NYC Parade
The Daycare Owner Exposed by Nick Shirley Was Just Slapped With Federal Charges
Another Illegal Alien Caused a Fatal Semi Crash in California
Democrats Launch Plan for 'Sabotage Proof' Elections, and the GOP Should Pay Attention
Second Amendment Foundation Wants Supreme Court Review of 'Sensitive Places' Challenge
Jeff Bezos Makes the Case For Why the Working Class Should Pay No...
Spencer Pratt Reveals Why He Became a Republican
Karen Bass Says She 'Needs' to Explore Letting Non-Citizens Vote
Tipsheet

Hey Liberals: Your 'Eco-Friendly' Cars Are Actually Causing More Pollution

Hey Liberals: Your 'Eco-Friendly' Cars Are Actually Causing More Pollution

So often the left entices their party with "Eco-friendly," science savvy, earth loving phenomenons. However, the National Bureau of Economic Research just found that on a per-mile basis electric cars are on average worse for the environment when compared to their gas-powered friends.

Advertisement

This new study proves that subsidizing these environmental "friendly" cars should be put to a halt.

In monetary terms, electric cars are about half-a-cent worse per mile for the environment than gas-powered cars, on average. This means that if a government wants to tax a car based on how much it pollutes, electric cars should be taxed half of one cent more per mile driven than gasoline cars.

While much is dependent on where exactly the cars are driven, this finding that electric cars are on average half-a-cent worse per mile than gas-powered cars blows out the common assumption that electric cars are the "clean" thing to do.

This past Tuesday the Obama administration gathered to rally support on climate change mainly stressing the impacts of on public health and the shortening of life:

casting "climate change as a moral issue, saying its health effects target society's most vulnerable, including children, the elderly and the poor.

Contrary to Obama's measures is the ever true reality that in purchasing an electric car it actually "makes society as a whole worse off because electric vehicles tend to export air pollution to other states more than gasoline vehicles."

Advertisement

Ironically, in 2008 Obama promoted electric cars by administering "an ambitious goal of putting 1 million advanced technology vehicles on the road by 2015."

With these efforts Obama was trying to reduce oil consumption, however this new study proves that the power for electric cars has a new source of energy that needs tackling: coal.

Although the typical assumption is that electric cars are cleaner than gasoline-fueled cars, the power for electric cars has to come from somewhere, and it's often from coal-fired power plants. "Rather than simply accepting the assertion of environmental benefits from electric vehicle use, this paper conducts a rigorous comparison of the environmental consequences of gasoline and electric powered vehicles, specifically by quantifying the externalities (both greenhouse gases and local air pollution) generated by driving these vehicles," the authors write.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement