Iran Is Merely a Chess Piece in a Much Bigger Game
You Cannot Make Up What Jasmine Crockett Said During Texas' Primaries Last Night
That Oyster Farmer With the Nazi Tattoos Who's Trying to Unseat Susan Collins...
INSANE: Austin Cops Who Killed Terrorist Could've Faced a Grand Jury on Possible...
GOP Senators Drop Fact Sheet Showing How This Dem-Led DHS Shutdown Is Impacting...
Secretary Hegseth Blasts the Democrats for Rooting for America to Fail in Iran
Iranian Journalist Masih Alinejad Just Destroyed Zohran Mamdani's Duplicity on Iran
ICE's Newest Undercover Vehicles Are Sure to Tick Off the Left
Secretary Hegseth Held Another Press Conference on Operation Epic Fury. Here's What He...
U.S. and Ecuador Launch Joint Strikes on Narco-Terrorists in Ecuador
Just Days After Condemning Operation Epic Fury, Zohran Mamdani's Flip-Flopped on Iran
SCOTUS: Actually Parents Do Matter
NATO Intercepts Iranian Missile Headed for Turkey
The Gateway to Tech Is the App Store – That’s Where Reform Must...
Ultimate Success in Iran Is Not As Elusive As Critics Charge
Tipsheet

Trump Asked This Republican to Argue Election Case Before the Supreme Court

Trump Asked This Republican to Argue Election Case Before the Supreme Court
AP Photo/Alex Brandon

President Trump has identified a lawsuit filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton as "the big one" when it comes to his legal challenges over the November election. If the Supreme Court decides to hear the suit, the president has asked a Republican senator to argue the case. 

Advertisement

President Trump called Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) to ask if he would be willing to make oral arguments in the Texas case if it goes before the Supreme Court, The New York Times reported. The Times notes that Sen. Cruz argued cases before the Supreme Court as solicitor general of Texas before joining the Senate in 2013. 

According to The Times, Sen. Cruz has agreed to the president's request. 

Cruz offered earlier this week to present oral arguments in a different case involving no-excuse mail-in voting that took place in Pennsylvania. But the Supreme Court decided not to intervene.

The Texas attorney general claims the defendants exploited the coronavirus pandemic by making changes to election rules inconsistent with relevant state law. Paxton argues the changes violate the U.S. Constitution because they were made by non-legislative entities. The lawsuit aims to delay the appointment of presidential electors from the defendant states. 

Advertisement

On Wednesday, the president filed a legal motion to intervene in the Texas case, arguing the president's rights as a candidate were affected by the actions of the four battleground states of Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia and Pennsylvania.

A group of 17 states has filed a brief with the Supreme Court in support of the Texas lawsuit.  

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos