The Usual Idiots Are on the Job As America Crushes the Iranian Tyrants
We Got Him: Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei Has Been Taken Out
Dems Are Proving to Be the Worst Partners in This Time of Crisis
Trump Freed Iran From a Dictator, and the Left Hates Him For It
Here's the Reason Why President Trump Authorized Operation Epic Fury
The Left's Astroturfed Pro-Iran Protests Are Underway, and They're Just As Bad As...
U.S. Military Reports No American Casualties in First 12 Hours of Operation Epic...
Read Zohran's Shameful and Dishonest Statement on the U.S. Iran Strikes
President Trump Releases a Statement on the Death of Iranian Supreme Leader Ali...
Over 40 Senior Iranian Officials Confirmed Dead in Operation Epic Fury
White House Says ‘Gang of Eight’ Was Properly Notified Before Operation Epic Fury
Pete Hegseth Reveals Details of 'Operation Epic Fury' Strike That Killed Ali Khamenei
The Memes From Operation Epic Fury Have Been Unreal
CENTCOM Gives a Bombshell Update on Iran Strikes in New Briefing
Guess What US Media Companies Are Parroting Likely Iranian Propaganda
Tipsheet

Trump Asked This Republican to Argue Election Case Before the Supreme Court

Trump Asked This Republican to Argue Election Case Before the Supreme Court
AP Photo/Alex Brandon

President Trump has identified a lawsuit filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton as "the big one" when it comes to his legal challenges over the November election. If the Supreme Court decides to hear the suit, the president has asked a Republican senator to argue the case. 

Advertisement

President Trump called Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) to ask if he would be willing to make oral arguments in the Texas case if it goes before the Supreme Court, The New York Times reported. The Times notes that Sen. Cruz argued cases before the Supreme Court as solicitor general of Texas before joining the Senate in 2013. 

According to The Times, Sen. Cruz has agreed to the president's request. 

Cruz offered earlier this week to present oral arguments in a different case involving no-excuse mail-in voting that took place in Pennsylvania. But the Supreme Court decided not to intervene.

The Texas attorney general claims the defendants exploited the coronavirus pandemic by making changes to election rules inconsistent with relevant state law. Paxton argues the changes violate the U.S. Constitution because they were made by non-legislative entities. The lawsuit aims to delay the appointment of presidential electors from the defendant states. 

Advertisement

On Wednesday, the president filed a legal motion to intervene in the Texas case, arguing the president's rights as a candidate were affected by the actions of the four battleground states of Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia and Pennsylvania.

A group of 17 states has filed a brief with the Supreme Court in support of the Texas lawsuit.  

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement