Watch Law Professor Jonathan Turley Decimate Jack Smith
Conservative CNN Guest Sets the Network Straight on the Latest ICE Incident in...
Democrat Sheriff's COVID Side Hustle Just Blew Up in His Face
Trump’s Message Sparked Something in Iran the Mullahs Didn’t See Coming
These Democratic States Might Have Lighter Wallets After What Trump Is Doing
Trump Considering Options for 'Decisive' Military Action Against Iranian Regime
From the Desert to...the Ice Rinks? Why Somalis, and Why Minneapolis
Florida Prosecutor Monique Worrell Defends Letting Violent Criminal Loose. You'll Never Gu...
TX-08 GOP Primary Draws Scrutiny As One Candidate’s Record Raises Red Flags
Finally! Turning Point USA Issues Candice Owens a Cease and Desist
Does Mamdani Have an Ego-Problem
An ‘America First’ Conservative… Who Loves Giving to Democrats? Introducing a Republican R...
JD Vance Warns That California Fraud Far Outpaces Minnesota’s
Guess Who Booed Howard Lutnick at the World Economic Forum—and Why Lutnick Called...
Did This Democrat AG Just Suggest That Shooting Masked ICE Agents Is Justifiable?
Tipsheet

Alan Dershowitz Predicts Trump SCOTUS Win in Pennsylvania Ballot Case

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

Liberal law professor Alan Dershowitz predicts the Trump campaign will prevail in its challenge over late-arriving ballots being counted in Pennsylvania so long as the number of ballots is enough to change the outcome of the Pennsylvania election and the matter goes before the U.S. Supreme Court. 

Advertisement

"I do think that Trump will win the Pennsylvania lawsuit," Dershowitz told host Joel Pollak on SiriusXM’s Breitbart News Tonight, "namely, the lawsuit that challenges ballots that were filed before the end of Election Day but not received until after Election Day." 

In a deadlock ruling, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court left in place a Pennsylvania court-ordered extension allowing late-arriving ballots to be accepted so long as the ballots are postmarked by Nov. 3 or if the postmark isn't legible and arrived several days after the election. 

"The [Pennsylvania] legislature had basically said no to that and the [Pennsylvania] Supreme Court said yes because of the pandemic," Dershowitz continued. "That may have been the right decision in some theoretical sense, but the Constitution doesn’t permit anybody in the state but the legislature to make decisions about elections."

A Pennsylvania judge bought into that argument on Thursday and ordered segregated ballots to be excluded from the vote count. The week before, Justice Samuel Alito ordered Pennsylvania election officials to segregate all late-arriving ballots while legal challenges work their way through the courts. 

Advertisement

Dershowitz said the argument made by the Trump campaign "clearly belongs in federal courts" and that he believes "the Republican argument is the stronger one." 

"The Supreme Court will take the case only if it would make a difference, only if the plaintiffs, the Republicans, can show that the number of disputed ballots that were subject to sequestration by Justice Alito’s decision exceeds the difference between the winning margin and the losing margin," said the Harvard law professor. 

Biden leads President Trump by more than 60,000 votes in the Keystone State. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement