Time to Purge the GOP Backstabbers, Sissies, and Narcissists
Democrats Seek to Destroy America
Not Ready? Please.
Nexit: Declare Your Independence From Net-Zero Climate Policies
Obergefell Will Be Overturned – But We Can Wait
Tucker Answers the Question
Can Trump Reunite the MAGA Coalition?
The Party of Mean Girls...and Petulant, Weak Boys
Michelle Obama Is the First Lady of Complaints
How the Left Targets the Most Ethical Conservatives With Bogus Lawfare
Bosnian-Born U.S. Citizen Pleads Guilty to Lying About Wartime Crimes to Obtain Citizenshi...
Hong Kong Man Indicted in Alleged SEC Filing Fraud Linked to $211 Million...
Trump Threatens To Replace RINO Indiana Republicans Who Won't Redistrict
John Fetterman Recovering From Fall After 20 Stitches
Federal Firearm Indictments Up 292 Percent Under Expanded Project Safe Neighborhoods in No...
Tipsheet

WATCH: Obama's DHS Secretary Obliterates Dems' Talking Points Over Soleimani's Death

AP Photo/Andrew Harnik

Since the United States carried out an airstrike last week that killed Iranian terrorist Qasem Soleimani, Democrats have repeatedly taken issue with the fact that the Trump administration didn't ask for Congressional approval. President Barack Obama's Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Jeh Johnson completely debunked that notion during a Sunday morning interview with MSNBC's Chuck Todd on "Meet the Press."

Advertisement

"If you believe everything our government is saying about General Soleimani, he was a lawful military objective and the president, under his Constitutional authority as commander-in-chief, had ample domestic legal authority to take him out without additional Congressional authorization," Johnson explained. "Whether he was a terrorist or a general in a military force that was engaged in armed attacks against our people, he was a lawful military objective."

According to a document prepared by the Peterson Air Force Base's Legal Office, "Military objectives are defined as any object which by its nature, location, purpose, or use makes an effective contribution to military action and whose total or partial destruction, capture, or neutralization, in the circumstances ruling at the time, offers a definite military advantage."

In this case, "destroying" Soleimani provided the United States a strong military advantage. After all, Soleimani was responsible for the deaths of hundreds of United States military personnel. And that's not even taking into account the fact that he also killed civilians. 

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement