The Woke Billionaires and Democrat-Loving Corporations Are on Their Own
So, That's How The New York Times Framed the ICE Ambush in Minneapolis...
The Departure of Top DOJ Attorneys Allegedly Over the ICE Shooting in Minneapolis...
Remember When CNN Did Ride-Alongs With ICE? Here's the (D)ifference.
Watch Josh Hawley Corner This Lib Doctor on Biology
Why the FBI Searched a Washington Post Reporter's Home Yesterday
The Non-Profit Political Scam
St. Paul Teachers Union Orders Members to ‘Pick a Side’ and Walk Out...
Cea Weaver Identifies the 'Huge Problem' Obstructing Her Communist Housing Agenda, and Gue...
Here’s How Jasmine Crockett Handled Tough Questions About Her Double Standard
Standards? What Standards?
Tintin Was Deadly Wrong
Mamdani's Fantasy World of Equal Outcome
Iran Past, Present, and Future: A Conversation With Marziyeh Amirizadeh, Part 2
Tearing Down Our History
Tipsheet

WATCH: Obama's DHS Secretary Obliterates Dems' Talking Points Over Soleimani's Death

AP Photo/Andrew Harnik

Since the United States carried out an airstrike last week that killed Iranian terrorist Qasem Soleimani, Democrats have repeatedly taken issue with the fact that the Trump administration didn't ask for Congressional approval. President Barack Obama's Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Jeh Johnson completely debunked that notion during a Sunday morning interview with MSNBC's Chuck Todd on "Meet the Press."

Advertisement

"If you believe everything our government is saying about General Soleimani, he was a lawful military objective and the president, under his Constitutional authority as commander-in-chief, had ample domestic legal authority to take him out without additional Congressional authorization," Johnson explained. "Whether he was a terrorist or a general in a military force that was engaged in armed attacks against our people, he was a lawful military objective."

According to a document prepared by the Peterson Air Force Base's Legal Office, "Military objectives are defined as any object which by its nature, location, purpose, or use makes an effective contribution to military action and whose total or partial destruction, capture, or neutralization, in the circumstances ruling at the time, offers a definite military advantage."

In this case, "destroying" Soleimani provided the United States a strong military advantage. After all, Soleimani was responsible for the deaths of hundreds of United States military personnel. And that's not even taking into account the fact that he also killed civilians. 

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos