It's About Time Democrats Are Finally Calling Themselves Socialists
Democreeps Only Believe Women When It’s Useful to Them
Donna Brazile Calls on Graham Platner to Drop Out So He Can Do...
CNN Was Just Incapable of Enjoying the 4th of July—but They Were Not...
Alicia Keys Doesn't Want Women to Have Equal Rights
How Mike Rowe's 'Build Freedom' Aims to Restore the Dignity of American Work
Mamdani's Twisted View of America
Chicago’s Violence Interruption Industry Faces Questions After Homicides Tick Up
Culture Still Matters
How My Father Mastered Cooling Our House Without Air Conditioning
The Tyrant’s Funeral Cannot Bury the Truth
We're Officially the World's Most Hated Soccer Team
The U.S. Has Been Eliminated in the World Cup After a Historic Run
How Did This Mistake Already Happen Again?
Sen. John Fetterman Blasts Graham Platner's Backers After Newest Allegation
Tipsheet

Whistleblower's Attorney May Take Legal Action Against Reporters. Here's Why.

Whistleblower's Attorney May Take Legal Action Against Reporters. Here's Why.
AP Photo/Evan Vucc

The Ukrainian whistleblower's legal team has repeatedly maintained the notion that their client's anonymity is important and is protected under the Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989.

Advertisement

According to the legal team's statement released on Thursday, the government isn't the only party responsible for protecting the whistleblower's identity. The media has a responsibility as well. Should a journalist or media outlet publish the whistleblower's name, they could face legal recourse: 

Accordingly, we neither confirm nor deny the identity of the Intelligence Community Whistleblower. Our client is legally entitled to anonymity. Disclosure of the name of any person who may be suspected to be the whistleblower places that individual and their family in great physical danger. Any physical harm the individual and/or their family suffers as a result of disclosure means that the individuals and publications reporting such names will be personally liable for that harm. Such behavior is at the pinnacle of irresponsibility and is intentionally reckless.

Although the attorneys, Andrew Bakaj and Mark Zaid, haven't explicitly said they would file lawsuits, they haven't ruled it out either.

“I am not going to be limiting any future options that may exist,” Bakaj told the Daily Caller News Foundation. 

Advertisement

Zaid recognized that there's no law on the books that prevents media outlets from publishing the whistleblowers alleged identity, but said that comes down to “ethics and professionalism.”

The Daily Caller pressed Bakaj on how reporters could be held liable for publishing the whistleblower's identity, but the attorney didn't provide any further context other than "he is not limiting future legal options."

A report has circulated alleging that 33-year-old Eric Ciaramella is the whistleblower. 

Republicans have repeatedly called for the release of the whistleblower's identity because of his personal political bias against President Donald Trump. We know the whistleblower is a registered Democrat and worked with former Vice President Joe Biden. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement