Here's Why Iran's Government Has Gotten Away With Tyranny
Trump Says He Is Concerned About the Midterm Elections
Don't Let Cea Weaver's Tears Fool You
Inside the Massachusetts Prison Where Women Live in Fear of 'Transgender' Inmates
Mamdani Voters Shrug at Venezuelan Immigrant's Warning Against Socialism
Guess Who Has Become a Propaganda Tool in Iran As the Regime Shuts...
Over a Dozen Oil Executives to Meet the President Trump As Venezuelan Oil...
The Gift of America and the Gift of Life
New York Man Indicted for Threatening to Kill Federal Agent and His Children
Texas Couple Convicted of Running $25M COVID-Era Pyramid Scheme That Defrauded 10,000 Vict...
Automakers Eat Billion-Dollar Losses on Electric Vehicles
Texas AG Ken Paxton Shuts Down Taxpayer Funded 'Abortion Tourism'
$500K Stolen, 20 States Targeted: Detroit Man Admits Wire Fraud and Identity Theft
DHS to Surge 1,000 Additional Agents Into Minneapolis As Protests Escalate
Oklahoma Chiropractor Indicted in $30M Health Care Fraud and COVID Relief Theft Scheme
Tipsheet

National Intelligence Director Dan Coats Is Out, John Ratcliffe Is In

AP Photo/Kevin Wolf, File

National Intelligence Director Dan Coats is resigning on August 15th, President Donald Trump announced via Twitter on Sunday. He will be tapping Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-TX) to take Coats place. 

Advertisement

An acting director is expected to be named soon as the transition moves forward.

Ratcliffee made waves last week when he ripped into Special Counsel Robert Mueller for making up a standard of guilt only applicable to President Trump.

"Now your report, and today you said that, 'All times the Special Counsel team operated under, was guided by, and followed Justice Department policies and principles,' so which DOJ policy or principle sets forth a legal standard that an investigated person is not exonerated if their innocence from criminal conduct is not conclusively determined?" Ratcliffe asked.

Advertisement

"Which DOJ policy or principle sets forth a legal standard that an investigated person is not exonerated if their innocence from criminal conduct is not conclusively determined? Where does that language come from, director?" Ratcliffe asked. "Where is the DOJ policy that says that? Let me make it easier, can you give me an example other than Donald Trump where the Justice Department determined that an investigated person was not exonerated because their innocence was not conclusively determined?"

This post has been updated with additional information.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement