Speaker Johnson Had a Legislative Hat Trick Today While Thune Wants to Sell...
Police Chief Secretly Installs AI Surveillance Cameras, Then Justifies It After Getting Bu...
WisDems Are Begging for an Early Voting Ballot Do-Over
Press Struggles With Immigrant Voting It Denies Happening; 'The View' Has Its Dress...
Polls Show Susan Collins Is Doing Well Against Troy Jackson, Too
Americans Should Not Be Falling for Socialism
Here's Why Being Pro-Big Business Isn't the Same Thing As Being Pro-Free Market
Maryland Audit: $2 Million Lottery Winner Kept Collecting Food Stamps
Day 12: U.S. Pounds Iran to Protect Ships in Strait of Hormuz
Rashida Tlaib Goes to Bat for Mamdani, Says She'll Help Arrest Netanyahu
New Jersey Man Sentenced to 48 Months in $4 Million Medicaid Fraud Scheme
Congressional Stock Trading Is About to Get Much Harder
Protecting, Saving and Spending: The Latest on Congressional Noise
Secret Service Seizes $25 Million in Crypto Tied to International Fraud Networks
NJ Software Vendor Says State Is to Blame for Erroneous Registration of 6,600...
Tipsheet

Dems: Prohibited Possessors Should Be Prosecuted for Trying to Buy Firearms, Unless...

Dems: Prohibited Possessors Should Be Prosecuted for Trying to Buy Firearms, Unless...
AP Photo/Cliff Owen

The House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday held a "markup session" for HR 8, the Democratic-sponsored gun control legislation that is currently being considered. The primary focus of the bill is passing universal background checks. 

Advertisement

During the hearing, Rep. Greg Steube (R-FL) introduced a simple amendment to the bill that would require Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) to report anyone who fails a background check to law enforcement agencies. Steube literally used the same language from a bill introduced by Rep. David Cicilline (D-RI) and sponsored by Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) during the last Congress. 

Democrats eventually voted down the amendment, and Chairman Nadler said he'd have to do a "hard look" at the amendment before they would considered adopting it.

During the hearing, Steube brought up a great point: what changed over the last year that would suddenly make the Democrats reject the very amendment they wanted themselves? 

Advertisement

The only thing that has significantly changed over the last year is the heated debate over illegal immigration and how to secure America's borders. 

The issue of illegal aliens obtaining firearms came up during the debate. Rep. Ken Buck (R-CO) slammed Democrats for failing to secure the border and not wanting FFLs to contact Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) when an illegal alien attempts to purchase a firearm.

Democrats, you can't have it both ways. You can't say you want to keep prohibited possessors from obtaining firearms, then pick and choose who can illegally obtain a gun. 

Advertisement

Here's the cold. Hard. Truth. 

A person who enters this country illegally has broken the law. They're not someone who should be in this country, let alone buying firearms here.

Last year alone, we had over 7.8 MILLION illegal aliens attempt to purchase firearms. And those are just the ones that the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) caught. That number is probably significantly higher. 

If gun control advocates truly want to take a stand against gun violence, then they'd prosecute prohibited possessors and turn illegal aliens over to ICE for deportation. 

Take your pick, Dems. You either protect your constituents or you protect illegal aliens. But both groups' interests are at odds with one another.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement