Read a Venezuelan Guard's 'Chilling' Account About the Delta Force Raid That Nabbed...
Watch What Happens When This Leftist Protester Accosts a CNN Reporter in Minneapolis
Is This Why the Media Isn't Covering the Iran Protests?
Here's How Much Commie Mamdani's 'Affordable' Government Housing Will Cost You
Knoxville Orchestra Plays Sour Notes of Racial Preference over Talent
ICE Stories They Don’t Tell You
They Can Hate Israel All They Want
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 302: What the Bible Says About Pain
CNN Panel Sparks Firestorm After Abby Phillip Calls Somali Families 'Victims' of Minnesota...
Syrian Man Pleads Guilty to Stealing Nearly $191K in U.S. Social Security Benefits
Leftist Agitators Stalk and Threaten to Kill Journalist Covering Minneapolis Unrest
Minneapolis Radicals Begin Distributing Devices to Disable ICE Vehicles
Sons of Liberty, Sons of Legacy: Forming the Men Who Will Shape America’s...
Banning the Muslim Brotherhood: A Good Start, Part 2
The Problem of Clergy Sowing Discord
Tipsheet

Ninth Circuit: Law Barring People From Encouraging Illegal Aliens to Enter U.S. Is Unconstitutional

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday struck down a law that makes it a crime to "encourage or induce” someone to come to the United States illegally. 

Advertisement

According to the Court, the law violates people's First Amendment rights because "it criminalizes a substantial amount of protected expression in relation to its narrow band of legitimacy prohibited conduct and unprotected expression."

"We do not think that any reasonable reading of the statute can exclude speech. To conclude otherwise, we would have to say that 'encourage' does not mean encourage, and that a person cannot 'induce' another with words," Judge A. Wallace Tashima wrote in the Court's opinion. "At the very least, it is clear that the statue potentially criminalize the simple words – spoken to a son, a wife, a parent, a friend, a neighbor, a coworker, a student, a client – 'I encourage you to stay here.'"

Judges Marsha Berzon and Andrew Hurwitz agreed with the opinion. And, of course, all three of them were appointed by Democrats.

The case, United States of America v. Evelyn Sineneng-Smith, was brought about when Sineneng-Smith, a former immigration attorney in San Jose, California, told her clients in the U.S. on visas that they would apply for permanent residence by applying for labor certification from Department of Labor. 

Advertisement

Related:

ILLEGAL ALIEN

According to a 2015 press release from Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Sineneng-Smith charged each client $5,900 to file the DOL certifications, despite knowing that her clients wouldn't qualify for the benefit under current law.

She was eventually found guilty and sentenced to 18 months in jail as well as a $15,000 fine for "encouraging illegal immigration for private financial gain, mail fraud, and willfully contributing to a fraudulent tax return."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement