There's No Coming Back From This
So, That's How NBC News Covered Police Confronting the Nashville Mass Shooter
You Won't Be Surprised to See What NBC News Report Left Out About...
Did the Diabolical CIA Really Try Repeatedly to Assassinate Poor Innocent Little Fidel...
Leftist WaPo Admits Trump Indictment a 'Poor Test Case' for Prosecuting the Former-Preside...
New Bill Would Criminalize ‘Abortion Trafficking’ of Minors
Trump's Indictment Will Make It Difficult for 2024 Republican Candidates to Shine
The Mirror’s Since-Deleted Profile of Nashville Shooting Suspect: 'Whimsical' and 'Childli...
Mayorkas Makes Stunning Admission On Border Crisis
Newsom Attacks Republicans In Latest Bid to Become Relevant
Florida Senate Quietly Files Bill Allowing DeSantis To Run For POTUS While Serving...
Trump's Campaign Shares Plans For His Arraignment: He Will Be 'Back At It'...
One Year Later – the Murder of a Christian Arab Israeli Hero
Our Message To The Left: Here I Stand
So, What Are YOU Prepared To Do?

Ninth Circuit: Law Barring People From Encouraging Illegal Aliens to Enter U.S. Is Unconstitutional

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday struck down a law that makes it a crime to "encourage or induce” someone to come to the United States illegally. 

According to the Court, the law violates people's First Amendment rights because "it criminalizes a substantial amount of protected expression in relation to its narrow band of legitimacy prohibited conduct and unprotected expression."

"We do not think that any reasonable reading of the statute can exclude speech. To conclude otherwise, we would have to say that 'encourage' does not mean encourage, and that a person cannot 'induce' another with words," Judge A. Wallace Tashima wrote in the Court's opinion. "At the very least, it is clear that the statue potentially criminalize the simple words – spoken to a son, a wife, a parent, a friend, a neighbor, a coworker, a student, a client – 'I encourage you to stay here.'"

Judges Marsha Berzon and Andrew Hurwitz agreed with the opinion. And, of course, all three of them were appointed by Democrats.

The case, United States of America v. Evelyn Sineneng-Smith, was brought about when Sineneng-Smith, a former immigration attorney in San Jose, California, told her clients in the U.S. on visas that they would apply for permanent residence by applying for labor certification from Department of Labor. 

According to a 2015 press release from Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Sineneng-Smith charged each client $5,900 to file the DOL certifications, despite knowing that her clients wouldn't qualify for the benefit under current law.

She was eventually found guilty and sentenced to 18 months in jail as well as a $15,000 fine for "encouraging illegal immigration for private financial gain, mail fraud, and willfully contributing to a fraudulent tax return."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Video