New England Dem Scrambles to Avoid Being Sent to the Concentration Camps After...
BETRAYAL: What Were These South Carolina Republicans Thinking?
Gov. Jeff Landry Draws a Red Line on Teacher Pay
The Flag Is Only 'Complicated' If You're a Democrat
It Seems Democrats Have No Plan to Win Back Male Voters
Hasan Piker Is Wondering Why His Political Ally Isn't Protecting Him From That...
Pope Leo's First Encyclical Provides Catholic Road Map for the Future of AI
Michigan Dem Mallory McMorrow Doubles Down on Defending Gender Mutilation of Children
Bishop Barron Blasts Catholic Leftists for Opposing Immigration Enforcement
Kevin O'Leary Says the War on AI Data Centers Is Being Driven by...
LOL: Xavier Becerra Thinks He'll Be the One to Finish CA's High Speed...
Spencer Pratt Just Turned LA’s Filth Into the Most Brutal Campaign Ad
DeSantis Scores Major Legal Victory in Redistricting Battle
20 Illegal Aliens Caught Hiding Inside of Semi-Truck Sleeping Compartment By Texas State...
Major University Faces Trump Admin Lawsuit: 'Hostile Educational Environment'
Tipsheet

Ninth Circuit: Law Barring People From Encouraging Illegal Aliens to Enter U.S. Is Unconstitutional

Ninth Circuit: Law Barring People From Encouraging Illegal Aliens to Enter U.S. Is Unconstitutional

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday struck down a law that makes it a crime to "encourage or induce” someone to come to the United States illegally. 

Advertisement

According to the Court, the law violates people's First Amendment rights because "it criminalizes a substantial amount of protected expression in relation to its narrow band of legitimacy prohibited conduct and unprotected expression."

"We do not think that any reasonable reading of the statute can exclude speech. To conclude otherwise, we would have to say that 'encourage' does not mean encourage, and that a person cannot 'induce' another with words," Judge A. Wallace Tashima wrote in the Court's opinion. "At the very least, it is clear that the statue potentially criminalize the simple words – spoken to a son, a wife, a parent, a friend, a neighbor, a coworker, a student, a client – 'I encourage you to stay here.'"

Judges Marsha Berzon and Andrew Hurwitz agreed with the opinion. And, of course, all three of them were appointed by Democrats.

The case, United States of America v. Evelyn Sineneng-Smith, was brought about when Sineneng-Smith, a former immigration attorney in San Jose, California, told her clients in the U.S. on visas that they would apply for permanent residence by applying for labor certification from Department of Labor. 

Advertisement

Related:

ILLEGAL ALIEN

According to a 2015 press release from Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Sineneng-Smith charged each client $5,900 to file the DOL certifications, despite knowing that her clients wouldn't qualify for the benefit under current law.

She was eventually found guilty and sentenced to 18 months in jail as well as a $15,000 fine for "encouraging illegal immigration for private financial gain, mail fraud, and willfully contributing to a fraudulent tax return."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement