The Left Were Absolute Psychopaths Following the Attack on the WHCA Dinner
WHCA Dinner Shooter Revealed Who He Was Targeting During His Attempt to Storm...
As Trump Responds to the WHCA Dinner Attack, a Lot of New Details...
Is This the WHCA Dinner Shooter? If So, He's a Kamala Harris Supporter
President Trump Was Just Escorted Out Of the WHCA Dinner
Democrats Have Always Created Racism and Always Will
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 317: What the Bible says about Blood –...
The 'No Kings' Movement Is Sheer Hypocrisy
Yeah, They Really Do Hate America
We Need a Second Fox-Like TV Network
Trump Just Took a Major Step Toward Beautifying Washington, D.C.
Special Rights: The Quiet Assault on Equal Justice
St. Louis Woman Sentenced to 3 Years for Stealing $2.3M From Children's Meal...
Man Charged With Running Illegal Alien Harboring Scheme Through Japanese Steakhouse Chain...
SPLC Indictment Threatens to Derail Benson's Run for Michigan Governor
Tipsheet

Judge Prohibits One State From Having Residency Requirements In Order to Vote

Judge Prohibits One State From Having Residency Requirements In Order to Vote

A temporary injunction was implemented on Monday over residency requirements in order to vote in New Hampshire. The new law that went into effect last year required those who registered to vote within 30 days of an election to provide documents proving that they live where they're attempting to vote, Reuters reported. The person must provide the documents within 10 days or the state will seek to verify their permanent residence.

Advertisement

What's interesting is the law doesn't require a physical address when voting.

According to the Court, this requirement would make lines at polling locations longer and even make it difficult for the disabled, students and the homeless to vote. The Justice also said the law is difficult for the average person to understand.

It was also pointed out that Democrats tend to use same-day registration at a higher rate than Republicans.

"...Courts have found that a unreasonable delays can result in unconstitutional deprivations of the right to vote," Presiding Justice Kenneth C. Brown wrote in his decision for the Hillsborough Superior Court Northern District in Manchester. “...Where the law threatens to disenfranchise an individual’s right to vote, the only viable remedy is to enjoin its enforcement."

The lawsuit was brought about by the League of Women Voters of New Hampshire. 

Now that this injunction has been implemented, enforcing this law will be put on hold while the New Hampshire Attorney General, Anne Edwards, decides on the state's next move. She didn't say whether or not the state will appeal the decision.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos