Don’t Panic About Trump’s Iran Strategy Just Yet
Oh, So That's What Happened to the Karmelo Anthony's Crowdfunding Page
Karmelo Anthony's Lawyer Said *What* About the Guilty Verdict?
We Know When Republicans Plan to Attack Graham Platner. It's a Very Critical...
Jasmine Crockett Just Took Her Defense of Karmelo Anthony Even Farther
The Reactions to Karmelo Anthony's Guilty Verdict Are Predictably Out of Control
60 Minutes Correspondent Drops Some Eye Roll-Worthy Remarks About the 'Bloodbath' at the...
Knicks Mount the Largest Comeback in NBA Finals History to Stun the Spurs...
These Executives Might Face Prison Time for Bribing Officials to Increase Electricity Pric...
The 60 Minutes Controversy
The War No One Else Is Fighting
A Reporter Accused the US of Potential War Crimes in Iran. Here's What...
Dawn or Twilight? America at 250
Here's When Trump Plans to Strike Iran Next
Children's YouTube Star Ms. Rachel Sings With Kids for Illegal Aliens Outside Newark...
Tipsheet

U.S. Court of Appeals Just Dealt Trump Administration a Blow on Asylum Claims

U.S. Court of Appeals Just Dealt Trump Administration a Blow on Asylum Claims
AP Photo/Eugene Garcia, File

The U.S. Court of Appeals in D.C. just issued a ruling upholding a decision by Obama-appointed Judge Randolph Moss that blocks the Trump administration from denying asylum claims to aliens who cross our border illegally.

Advertisement

The highlighted portion reads:

The INA does not allow the President to remove Plaintiffs under summary removal procedures of his own making. Nor does it allow the Executive to suspend the Plaintiffs' right to apply for asylum, deny Plaintiffs' access to withholding of removal under the INA, or curtail mandatory procedures for adjudicating Plaintiffs' Convention against Torture claims.

Here's more:

An appeals court on Friday blocked President Donald Trump’s executive order suspending asylum access, a key pillar of the Republican president’s plan to crack down on migration at the southern border of the U.S.

A three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit found that immigration laws give people the right to apply for asylum at the border, and the president can’t circumvent that.

ACLU attorney Lee Gelernt said in a statement that the appellate ruling is “essential for those fleeing danger who have been denied even a hearing to present asylum claims under the Trump administration’s unlawful and inhumane executive order.”

The opinion was written by Judge J. Michelle Childs, who was nominated to the bench by Democratic President Joe Biden. Judge Justin Walker, a Trump nominee, wrote a partial dissent. Judge Cornelia Pillard, who was nominated by Democratic President Barack Obama, also heard the case.

Advertisement

Anyone who crosses the border has traveled through multiple countries in which they could request asylum. 

As Townhall reported last week, lawyers are coaching asylum seekers to lie about being gay to make asylum claims.

This case will likely go before the Supreme Court, as have other asylum and immigration-related cases.

Editor’s Note: Thanks to President Trump, illegal immigration into our great country has virtually stopped. Despite the radical left's lies, new legislation wasn't needed to secure our border, just a new president.

Help us continue to report the truth about the president's border policies and mass deportations. Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement