Jamie Raskin's Low Opinion of Women
Thank You, GOD!
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 306: ‘Fear Not' Old Testament – Part 2
The War on Warring
Jeffries Calls Citizenship Proof ‘Voter Suppression’ as Majority of Americans Back Voter I...
Four Reasons Why the Washington Post Is Dying
Foreign-Born Ohio Lawmaker Pushes 'Sensitive Locations' Bill to Limit ICE Enforcement
TrumpRx Triggers TDS in Elizabeth Warren
Texas Democrat Goes Viral After Pitting Whites Against Minorities
U.S. Secret Service Seized 3 Card Skimmers in Alabama, Stopping $3.1M in Fraud
Jasmine Crockett Finally Added Some Policy to Her Website and It Was a...
No Sanctuary in the Sanctuary
Chromosomes Matter — and Women’s Sports Prove It
The Economy Will Decide Congress — If Republicans Actually Talk About It
The Real United States of America
Tipsheet

Sessions Has Made a Decision About Appointing a Second Special Counsel

Attorney General Jeff Sessions told lawmakers Thursday he will not be naming a second special counsel at this time, explaining in a letter that a federal prosecutor is reviewing allegations of misconduct at the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Department of Justice.

Advertisement

“I write in response to recent letters requesting the appointment of a Special Counsel to review certain prosecutorial and investigative determinations made by the Department of Justice in 2016 and 2017. I take the concerns you raise seriously,” Sessions wrote in a letter to Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte and House Oversight Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy. 

But, he said, a second special counsel is named only in "the most 'extraordinary circumstances.' "

"To justify such an appointment, the Attorney General would need to conclude that 'the public interest would be served by removing a large degree of responsibility for the matter from the Department of Justice,' " Sessions added.

The attorney general asked U.S. Attorney John Huber to investigate Republicans’ allegations that the DOJ and FBI abused a surveillance program against a former Trump campaign aide. 

"The additional matters raised in your March 6, 2018, letter fall within the scope of his existing mandate, and I am confident that Mr. Huber's review will include a full, complete, and objective evaluation of these matters in a manner that is consistent with the law and the facts," Sessions said.

After Huber’s review is complete, a recommendation will be provided that will help determine whether or not a second special counsel is needed, Sessions explained.

Advertisement

Reps. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) and Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) were disappointed in Sessions’s decision.

The two GOP lawmakers have seen the DOJ's inspector general report about former FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe, which revealed he lied four times about leaking information to the press. 

"We need to have this special counsel. I disagree with the attorney general," Meadows said on Fox News Thursday. "For the attorney general to suggest there's not enough there there is just extremely disappointing."

Jordan noted that in addition to McCabe, there have been other top FBI officials who worked on the Russia and Clinton investigation that were fired or demoted.

"If those aren't extraordinary circumstances warranting a second special counsel, I don't know what the heck is," Jordan said. "I don't know why the attorney general keeps postponing this. Everyone in town knows we need a second special counsel to get to the bottom of this."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement