New Polling Shows the Left's Climate Change Hysteria Losing Steam
America's Largest Muslim Advocacy Group Is Very Upset Their Pro-Hamas Encampment Is Gone
Time to Go: Police Begin Dismantling Pro-Hamas Camp at George Washington University
It's Not Columbia University, but It Doesn't Negate the Error These Pro-Hamas Clowns...
Joe Biden Just Lost Another Battle With His Teleprompter
Biden's Use of TikTok Cited to Support Company's Lawsuit Against the Government
Gov. Abbott Has a Message for Texas Schools Following Biden's Title IX Rewrite
The 2024 Pulitzer Prizes Show the Focus Is Less on Journalism and More...
Department of Education's Move Forces Jewish Groups to Pull Out of Meeting
Sickening: 'Newcomer' Illegal Immigrant Arrested in Florida for Heinous Crime
The IRA Is Punishing Small Businesses and Putting Cancer Patients at Risk
House Dems Are Asking for Executive Action on the Border, but KJP of...
Boeing Cargo Plane Forced to Make Emergency Landing After Gear Fails
Vulnerable Dem Incumbent Sherrod Brown: Biden's Politics 'Not Much Different From Mine'
Here’s Why One Pharmaceutical Company Will Withdraw Its COVID-19 Vaccine
Tipsheet

Report: Pentagon Hid Study Exposing Billions in Bureaucratic Waste

The Pentagon is coming under fire for hiding a study that exposed billions in waste, fearing Congress would cut the defense budget as a result, The Washington Post has learned.

Advertisement

The report found that the Defense Department was paying more than 1 million contractors, civilians, and uniformed personnel to fill back-office jobs that support the 1.3 million active duty troops.

The internal study was requested to help come up with savings in combat power as well as make the bureaucracy more efficient, but when the report revealed $125 billion in administrative waste—far more than anticipated—senior defense officials were quick to bury it.

But some Pentagon leaders said they fretted that by spotlighting so much waste, the study would undermine their repeated public assertions that years of budget austerity had left the armed forces starved of funds. Instead of providing more money, they said, they worried Congress and the White House might decide to cut deeper.

So the plan was killed. The Pentagon imposed secrecy restrictions on the data making up the study, which ensured no one could replicate the findings. A 77-page summary report that had been made public was removed from a Pentagon website. [...]

“They’re all complaining that they don’t have any money. We proposed a way to save a ton of money,” Robert “Bobby” L. Stein, a private-equity investor who served as chairman of the Defense Business Board, told the Post.

Advertisement

“We’re going to be in peril because we’re spending dollars like it doesn’t matter,” he added.

On the campaign trail Donald Trump promised to build up the military, paying for it with savings from waste.

“I will ask that savings be accomplished through common sense reforms that eliminate government waste and budget gimmicks,” he said in a September speech to the Union League of Philadelphia.

While the Pentagon is a good place to start, the next big challenge will be getting Congress on board.

Arnold Punaro, a retired Marine general and former staff director for the Senate Armed Services Committee, told the Post just how difficult that will be because lawmakers resist even the slightest attempts to cut the Pentagon's workforce, fearing jobs in their districts will be lost.

Without support from Congress, “you can’t even get rid of the guy serving butter in the chow hall in a local district, much less tens of thousands of jobs,” he told the Post.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement