'This Is Where the Systematic Killing Took Place': 200 Days of War From...
NYPD Arrests Dozens Who Besieged Area Near Chuck Schumer's Home
White House Insists Biden Has Been 'Very Clear' About His Position on Pro-Hamas...
Watch Biden Lose the Battle With His Teleprompter Again
NYT Claims Trump Is Getting 'Favorable Treatment' from the NYPD
Texas Doesn't Take Passive Approach to Anti-Israel Mobs
Columbia Prof Who Called to Defund the Police, Now Wants Police to Protect...
Pelosi's Daughter Criticizes J6 Judges Who are 'Out for Blood' After Handing Down...
Mike Johnson Addresses Anti-Israel Hate As Hundreds Harass the School’s Jewish Community
DeSantis May Not Be Facing Biden in November, but Still Offers Perfect Response...
Lawmakers in One State Pass Legislation to Allow Teachers to Carry Guns in...
UnitedHealth Has Too Much Power
Former Democratic Rep. Who Lost to John Fetterman Sure Doesn't Like the Senator...
Biden Rewrote Title IX to Protect 'Trans' People. Here's How Somes States Responded.
Watch: Joe Biden's Latest Flub Is Laugh-Out-Loud Funny
Tipsheet

Grassley: 'Vague' FBI Letter on Clinton Case Leaves More Questions

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley is calling FBI Director James Comey's Sunday afternoon announcement reaffirming the Bureau's July decision not to indict Democrat Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton "vague" and in need of further explanation. 

Advertisement

“For months now, I’ve been urging the FBI to provide details regarding the scope of its investigation. The American people deserve to know whether the FBI sought to determine if Secretary Clinton and her aides deliberately maneuvered around federal open records laws or congressional investigations. Another vague announcement by the FBI has again failed to provide this context," Grassley released Sunday evening in a statement. "The growing number of unanswered questions demand explanations:  Is the FBI continuing to review the newly-revealed emails?  Did the FBI limit its review to email from when Clinton was Secretary of State, leaving out emails that could shed light on possible obstruction of Congress? Did the Justice Department authorize an application for a search warrant for this latest review, and if so, was it the first time such a tool was used in this investigation?  Did the FBI seek compulsory process earlier in its review, and if not, why not?  Answers to these questions would provide greater context of the FBI’s investigation and greater assurance to the American people of its thoroughness."

Advertisement

Meanwhile, Democrats back to praising Comey and the FBI after a week of condemnation for publicly announcing the investigation into Clinton's private server was reopened.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement