Oh, So That's Why DOJ Isn't Going After Pro-Terrorism Agitators
The UN Endorses a Second Terrorist State for Iran
The Stormy Daniels Trial Was Always Going to Be a Circus. It's Reached...
Biden Administration Hurls Israel Under the Bus Again
Israeli Ambassador Shreds the U.N. Charter in Powerful Speech Before Vote to Grant...
MSNBC Is Pro-Adult Film Testimony
The Long Haul of Love
Here's Where Speaker Mike Johnson Stands on Abortion
Trump Addresses the Very Real Chance of Him Going to Jail
Yes, Jen Psaki Really Said This About Biden Cutting Off Weapons Supply to...
3,000 Fulton County Ballots Were Scanned Twice During the 2020 Election Recount
Joe Biden's Weapons 'Pause' Will Get More Israeli Soldiers, Civilians Killed
Left-Wing Mayor Hires Drag Queen to Spearhead 'Transgender Initiatives'
NewsNation Border Patrol Ride Along Sees Arrest of Illegal Immigrants in Illustration of...
One State Just Cut Off Funding for Planned Parenthood
Tipsheet

Dem Rep: "We Aren't Being Paid Properly"

Is this becoming a trend? Instead of using his time in front of the cameras to champion the rights of working and middle class Americans, Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-FL) showed his true colors yesterday by arguing that members of Congress deserve a raise.

Advertisement

Huh? Evidently, his six-figure salary isn’t enough:

Rep. Alcee L. Hastings made the politically tone-deaf case for raising salaries for members of Congress Monday, pointing to the high cost of living in the District of Columbia.

“Members deserve to be paid, staff deserves to be paid and the cost of living here is causing serious problems for people who are not wealthy to serve in this institution,” the Florida Democrat said at a Rules Committee meeting, referring to the average member’s $174,000 annual salary. “We aren’t being paid properly,” he later added.

In fairness, as the article points out, Rep. Hastings is one of the ‘poorest’ members of Congress. But having no wealth as a federal lawmaker is like being the lowliest member of the country club. Remember, the guy makes $174,000 annually, as do all his colleagues. Is that not generous enough? And while that does not necessarily put him in the vaunted one percent, he’s doing pretty damn well all things considered. So if he were serious about the financial cares and concerns of ordinary people—like, say, his constituents—wouldn't he put their interests first?

Apparently, however, the cost of living in DC is just too expensive for him to devote himself to such trivial matters. Well done, sir.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement