Biden Issues New Sanctions on Iran, But There's a Catch
The Two Words These Google Employees Heard After Their Anti-Israel Protest Blew Up...
Here's Who Bob Menendez Might Throw Under the Bus During His Corruption Case
Biden Said He Warned Israel Not to Move on 'Haifa'
That Civil War Movie Is a Symptom of Hollywood’s Problems
Jury Selection Process in Trump Trial Just Hit Another Snag
Conservatives Should Stop Embracing Liberals Just Because They Say Something We Like
A New National Survey Just Dropped. Here's What It Shows About Trump vs....
Student Suspended for Using a Legally Correct Term in Classroom Discussion
A Lengthy Argument Broke Out Between Raskin, Comer During CCP Hearing
Undercover Video: Top Adviser Claims Who's the Second Most Powerful Person in WH...and...
Judge Halts Law Banning So-Called 'Gender-Affirming' Care for Kids
USC is Wrong to Cancel Radical Anti-Israel Valedictorian's Speech Over Alleged 'Security'...
43 Democrats Vote Against Resolution Condemning Pro-Genocidal Phrase
Is America a 'Failed Historical Model'?
Tipsheet

Office of Congressional Ethics Wants John Lewis and Staff Subpoenaed

The Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust filed a complaint with the Office of Congressional Ethics back in January charging Rep. John Lewis (D-GA) with allowing his chief of staff Michael Collins to simultaneously act as his campaign treasurer and chief of staff during the 2016 cycle. After reportedly failing to comply with the ethics inquiry, the OCE has recommended that the House Ethics Committee subpoena both men.

Advertisement

In its documents, the OCE goes into detail about Collins's reported violations.

NATURE OF THE ALLEGED VIOLATION: From March 2015 until January 2017, Mr.Michael Collins, the Chief of Staff to Rep. John Lewis, served as Treasurer for the John Lewis for Congress campaign committee (the “campaign committee”). Mr. Collins received consulting fees from the campaign committee for work that may have involved fiduciary duties. Through his employment at the House of Representatives, Mr. Collins receives a salary that qualifies him as senior staff. If Mr. Collins received compensation for providing services to the campaign committee that involved a fiduciary relationship or served for compensation as an officer of the campaign committee, then he may have violated House rules and federal law. 

In calendar year 2015, the campaign committee paid Mr. Collins $27,550.00. In calendar year 2015, the outside earned income limit for senior staff was $27,225.00. If Mr. Collins received more than $27,255.00 in income from the campaign committee in 2015, then he may have violated House rules and federal law.

Advertisement

The charges were incriminating enough, but then both Lewis and Collins proved to be uncooperative in the investigation. 

Michael Collins

71. The OCE requested information from Mr. Collins related payments to him from the campaign committee, and related to his hiring, removal, or withdrawal, and the terms and conditions of his service as Treasurer.

72. Mr. Collins provided the OCE with two pages of documents related to his repayments to the campaign committee, but refused to provide the OCE with additional materials.

John Lewis for Congress

73. The OCE requested information from John Lewis for Congress related to payments from the campaign committee to Mr. Collins and his hiring, removal, or withdrawal, and the terms and conditions of his service as Treasurer.

74. John Lewis for Congress provided the OCE with four pages of IRS income records, but refused to provide the OCE with additional materials.

Collins's counsel Robert P. Charrow responded to the OCE arguing that it "mischaracterizes" his role on Rep. Lewis's campaigns. First, he notes, Collins received only $295 in overpayment and repaid the amount promptly. It was a "simple and minor arithmetic error." Second, Collins served as a voluntary treasurer for the campaign committee, not the de facto treasurer. Charrow also notes that Collins has worked faithfully for Lewis for 20 years and only served as treasurer for one election cycle. His behavior, the counsel concludes, was "entirely proper."

Advertisement

Charrow also seemed to suggest that the ethics complaint was a partisan attack, considering it came shortly after Rep. Lewis made statements that were "highly critical of the new administration."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement