Norwegian Olympian: I Won the Bronze. Also, I Cheated on My Girlfriend
FBI Warns of Dangerous New Threat to ICE and Border Patrol Agents
Justice Department Wanted Michigan’s Voters’ Data — a Judge Had Other Ideas
Senate Democrats Are Gearing Up for a Fight to Protect Sanctuary Cities
Guess Which House Republican Voted Against the SAVE America Act Today
OSU Just Hired an Assistant Professor of What?
Antifa Is Now Targeting Moderate Congressional Democrats in Washington State
Man's Best Friend: Mystery Dog Helps Louisville Police Find Missing Toddler
Sen. Alex Padilla Gets Dragged for Sharing a Letter From Detained Migrant Child
When Sports Were Fun
West Virginia Senate Has Good News on Gun Rights for Legal Adults Under...
Mamdani Asks State Lawmakers to Approve a Two Percent Tax on the Wealthy...
Pam Bondi Goes Toe-to-Toe With Democrats in Explosive House Judiciary Hearing
Justice Jackson Defends Her Grammys Appearance
Steve Hilton Promises a ‘Political Revolution’ in California, and He’s Leading in the...
Tipsheet

Office of Congressional Ethics Wants John Lewis and Staff Subpoenaed

The Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust filed a complaint with the Office of Congressional Ethics back in January charging Rep. John Lewis (D-GA) with allowing his chief of staff Michael Collins to simultaneously act as his campaign treasurer and chief of staff during the 2016 cycle. After reportedly failing to comply with the ethics inquiry, the OCE has recommended that the House Ethics Committee subpoena both men.

Advertisement

In its documents, the OCE goes into detail about Collins's reported violations.

NATURE OF THE ALLEGED VIOLATION: From March 2015 until January 2017, Mr.Michael Collins, the Chief of Staff to Rep. John Lewis, served as Treasurer for the John Lewis for Congress campaign committee (the “campaign committee”). Mr. Collins received consulting fees from the campaign committee for work that may have involved fiduciary duties. Through his employment at the House of Representatives, Mr. Collins receives a salary that qualifies him as senior staff. If Mr. Collins received compensation for providing services to the campaign committee that involved a fiduciary relationship or served for compensation as an officer of the campaign committee, then he may have violated House rules and federal law. 

In calendar year 2015, the campaign committee paid Mr. Collins $27,550.00. In calendar year 2015, the outside earned income limit for senior staff was $27,225.00. If Mr. Collins received more than $27,255.00 in income from the campaign committee in 2015, then he may have violated House rules and federal law.

Advertisement

The charges were incriminating enough, but then both Lewis and Collins proved to be uncooperative in the investigation. 

Michael Collins

71. The OCE requested information from Mr. Collins related payments to him from the campaign committee, and related to his hiring, removal, or withdrawal, and the terms and conditions of his service as Treasurer.

72. Mr. Collins provided the OCE with two pages of documents related to his repayments to the campaign committee, but refused to provide the OCE with additional materials.

John Lewis for Congress

73. The OCE requested information from John Lewis for Congress related to payments from the campaign committee to Mr. Collins and his hiring, removal, or withdrawal, and the terms and conditions of his service as Treasurer.

74. John Lewis for Congress provided the OCE with four pages of IRS income records, but refused to provide the OCE with additional materials.

Collins's counsel Robert P. Charrow responded to the OCE arguing that it "mischaracterizes" his role on Rep. Lewis's campaigns. First, he notes, Collins received only $295 in overpayment and repaid the amount promptly. It was a "simple and minor arithmetic error." Second, Collins served as a voluntary treasurer for the campaign committee, not the de facto treasurer. Charrow also notes that Collins has worked faithfully for Lewis for 20 years and only served as treasurer for one election cycle. His behavior, the counsel concludes, was "entirely proper."

Advertisement

Charrow also seemed to suggest that the ethics complaint was a partisan attack, considering it came shortly after Rep. Lewis made statements that were "highly critical of the new administration."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement