Video Captures an NYU Pro-Hamas Activist Who’s Totally Clueless About What They're Protest...
Will Jewish Voters Stop Voting For The Democrats Who Want To Kill Them?
Is Biden Serious With His Victory Lap on 'National Security'?
Someone Has to Be the Adult in the Room: Clear the Quad and...
Our Gallows Hill — The Latest Trump Witch Trial
Adding to the Title IX Law
‘Hush Money’ Case Against Trump Is Bad On The Law and On the...
Stop the 'Emergency Spending' Charade Already
Joe Biden’s Hitler Problem
Universities of America You Are Directly Responsible for the Rise of Jew Hatred...
The 'Belongers', Part II
Banning TikTok a Blow to Free Speech
Human Dreck
Border Crisis Solution - Forget Biden and Speaker Johnson
NPR Whistleblower Highlights Everything Wrong With Journalism Today
Tipsheet

Sessions Changes Obama Policy, Will Increase Civil Asset Forfeiture

Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced Wednesday that the Justice Department will be increasing the use of civil asset forfeiture, especially in terms of drug trafficking, once more rolling back President Obama's agenda.

Advertisement

His announcement brought bipartisan criticism.

Opponents of civil asset forfeiture, which permits law enforcement officials to take money and goods from individuals suspected of crime, provide evidence to suggest that the process accounts for more theft than burglaries.

The legal process is often ripe with abuse, reports The Washington Post, particularly in regards to a practice known as "adoptive" forfeiture. Citing these concerns, the Justice Department under Obama sought to scale back the practice in 2015.

In 2015, Eric Holder's Justice Department issued a memo sharply curtailing a particular type of forfeiture practice that allowed local police to share part of their forfeiture proceeds with federal authorities. Known as “adoptive” forfeiture, it allowed state and local authorities to sidestep sometimes stricter state laws, processing forfeiture cases under the more permissive federal statute.

Advertisement

Republicans, too, are "troubled" by Sessions's directive.

Sessions, however, defended civil asset forfeiture as "appropriate," for "no criminal should be allowed to keep the proceeds of their crime."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement