This City Councilman Turned a $50K Deal Into a Personal Payday. Now He's...
Meet the Conservative Outsider Who Wants to Bring Common Sense Back to His...
How This Small-Town Police Force Became a 'Criminal Organization'
Iranian Regime's Latest Move Shows How Desperate It Has Become
CBS News Tried to Recalibrate Detention Stats — DHS Was Having None of...
If 'The Only Thing More Powerful Than Hate Is Love' Democrats Missed the...
Elites Did Their Part to Fight Global Warming by Flying Dozens of Private...
Man Who Pushed Propaganda About a Young Gazan Boy Slaughtered By The IDF...
Harry Sisson Refuses to House Illegals in His Home, And Claims ICE Agent...
Critics Blast Katie Porter's Pre Super Bowl X Post As She Tries to...
Will We Reach 100 Days of Straight Liberal Content on the Apple News...
Immigration Win: Federal Court Sides With Trump Admin on TPS Terminations for Multiple...
Federal Judge Blocks California Effort to Demask ICE Agents
Jasmine Crockett Might Be Running the Most Incompetent Campaign in History
WaPo Claims That Bad Bunny's Profane Performance Represented 'Wholesome Family Values'
Tipsheet

New Poll Shows Voters Really Don't Want Sarah Palin As VP

Almost half of voters would be less inclined to vote for Donald Trump if he chose Sarah Palin as his running mate, according to a new poll by Monmouth University.

Advertisement

The poll shows how voters would react to six potential running mate choices for each presidential candidate. With 42 percent reacting negatively, the poll suggests that Palin would have the most negative impact on Trump’s presidential bid.

Patrick Murray, the director of the Monmouth University Polling Institute, said that vice presidential nominees “usually do not have a significant impact on the national electorate.” In assessing the importance of the choice of running mate, Murray stated, “At best, they can help with a specific constituency or in a key state. At worse, they can demonstrate poor decision-making on the part of a person who aspires to be leader of the free world.”

After Palin, the candidate with the most negative impact on Trump’s presidential bid was New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, with 28 percent of voters saying they would be less likely to vote for Trump if he chose Christie as his running mate. After Christie was former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich (26 percent), Florida Sen. Marco Rubio (20 percent), Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions (17 percent), and Iowa Sen. Joni Ernst (15 percent).

Advertisement

Related:

DONALD TRUMP

The former governor of Alaska was an early endorser of Trump, voicing her support in January, two weeks before the Iowa caucus. On July 1, Trump and Palin will together speak at the Western Conservative Summit in Denver, an event billed as the “largest gathering of conservatives outside of Washington D.C.”

The popular betting website PaddyPower.com puts Palin’s odds for being Trump’s vice presidential pick at 33 to one.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement