terrifying
lol these robots can't even run
the craziest moment from China’s AI robot race pic.twitter.com/Bhlgg4BG2x
— el.cine (@EHuanglu) August 26, 2026
lol these robots can't even run
the craziest moment from China’s AI robot race pic.twitter.com/Bhlgg4BG2x
— el.cine (@EHuanglu) August 26, 2026
this is a weak statement
Official Response from Sen @lisamurkowski's Press Team https://t.co/4vsILtwRro pic.twitter.com/feCUQtAkuM
— James O'Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) August 25, 2026
MONEY
actually, this
🚨 Judge Indira Talwani lifted her nationwide injunction against President Trump’s election executive order, allowing USPS’s new mail-ballot rules to take effect after the Supreme Court’s ruling on Monday. pic.twitter.com/LpYeUj2MXl
— SCOTUS Wire (@scotus_wire) August 26, 2026
actually, this
🚨 Judge Indira Talwani lifted her nationwide injunction against President Trump’s election executive order, allowing USPS’s new mail-ballot rules to take effect after the Supreme Court’s ruling on Monday. pic.twitter.com/LpYeUj2MXl
— SCOTUS Wire (@scotus_wire) August 26, 2026
Are you using the embed button, sir?
this is what i meant to post <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">🚨 Judge Indira Talwani lifted her nationwide injunction against President Trump’s election executive order, allowing USPS’s new mail-ballot rules to take effect after the Supreme Court’s ruling on Monday. <a href="https://t.co/LpYeUj2MXl">pic.twitter.com/LpYeUj2MXl</a></p>— SCOTUS Wire (@scotus_wire) <a href="https://x.com/scotus_wire/status/2092661653728788532?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 26, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
this is what i meant to post <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">🚨 Judge Indira Talwani lifted her nationwide injunction against President Trump’s election executive order, allowing USPS’s new mail-ballot rules to take effect after the Supreme Court’s ruling on Monday. <a href="https://t.co/LpYeUj2MXl">pic.twitter.com/LpYeUj2MXl</a></p>— SCOTUS Wire (@scotus_wire) <a href="https://x.com/scotus_wire/status/2092661653728788532?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 26, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
You'll want to use the embed feature instead of posting the link
#BREAKING: Mojtaba Khamenei Iran’s supreme leader is reportedly dead or is in a “state of brain death.”
— Insider (World News) (@InsiderWN) August 26, 2026
https://x.com/scotus_wire/status/2092661653728788532?s=20 this is a big deal
Counting down with everyone! https://t.co/FhRumftT4S
— Tim Cook (@tim_cook) August 26, 2026
Apple !
JUST IN: OpenAI says it will achieve AGI by the end of this year.
— Watcher.Guru (@WatcherGuru) August 26, 2026

We're introducing Gemini 3.5 Transcribe, our most precise speech-to-text model yet 🔊
— Google (@Google) August 26, 2026
It turns audio into precise transcription in 85+ languages, removing filler words like "ums" and "ahs" while handling self-corrections and capturing your intent so you can get things done using… pic.twitter.com/4GgHjSd301
https://x.com/bennyjohnson/status/2
🚨The World Is About To Change FOREVER: The REAL Reason The CIA Just Landed in Moscow on Secret Jet https://t.co/ZLaOD6bEca
— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) August 26, 2026
092615783566487963?s=20
"There's a reference to, you know, unstable people coming to the courthouse, to conspiracy theorists saying things online. We're all aware of that. I mean, I don't know what the court has read. It's none of my business. I've received some wacky phone calls and emails, people telling me what they think happened here. It's noise. We're not litigating this case in the press. We're not talking to crazies," the transcript read.
and another thing
As Tyler Robinson's defense team prepares for a ruling on whether or not their client will face trial for the assassination of Charlie Kirk, they've now been reduced to pushing back against the online conspiracy theorists like Candace Owens who claim that Robinson was not Kirk's alleged killer.
A couple of weeks ago, the defense filed a motion arguing the case shouldn't qualify for the death penalty because Robinson didn't intend to hurt anyone other than Kirk. Absent from that motion were any of the arguments and so-called evidence laid out by Owens and the rest.
As Tyler Robinson's defense team prepares for a ruling on whether or not their client will face trial for the assassination of Charlie Kirk, they've now been reduced to pushing back against the online conspiracy theorists like Candace Owens who claim that Robinson was not Kirk's alleged killer.
A couple of weeks ago, the defense filed a motion arguing the case shouldn't qualify for the death penalty because Robinson didn't intend to hurt anyone other than Kirk. Absent from that motion were any of the arguments and so-called evidence laid out by Owens and the rest.
This is a test.
- lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipiscing elit in sit libero fugiat occaecat non temporibus non voluptatum id magna.
- Cupiditate in nobis voluptas est facere laborum duis sunt et id id aut est soluta ad non possimus.
- Ducimus quidem aut dolor sunt fugiat fuga irure consectetur officia voluptate nulla quas
She said something.
Hello world

Important Stuff
- One two three
- Four five
- Six seven eight
Heading 2
Heading 3
Heading 4
How about some code in here?