Setting A Conservative Agenda

Posted: May 21, 2008 5:04 PM
Setting A Conservative Agenda

It seems everyone these days knows how the Republican Party can stop its internal bleeding and win a few elections this November. And while there are many good ideas floating around (and a few bad ones), almost everyone offering their free advice is offering it specifically to presumptive Republican presidential nominee John McCain. And while McCain needs as much good advice as he can get, his name is only going to be the one at the top of the ballot this November.

Thousands of other Republicans running for offices around the country have not only a chance to win, but a chance to rededicate the Republican Party and reform our country in the process. While many of the pressing issues have changed since 1994 and 1980, rejections of traditional conservatism as old or stale simply do not jive with reality. To paraphrase G.K. Chesterton, conservatism has not been tried and found wanting; it has been found difficult and left untried. But that won’t do.

Conservatives who want to win elections and transform our society will never be successful by adapting it to fit the times; it simply needs to be applied to our times. Our core principles of order, justice, and freedom do not change. Conservatism can always use more and better spokesmen, and more and better leadership, but the idea that conservatives should be running scared in 2008 is preposterous. We shouldn’t run scared; we should run on conservative Values.

The best agenda any conservative could propose is right where it’s always been. Republican incumbents and challengers running for Congress this year can translate the values of order, justice, and freedom into five basic principles for conservative government: winning the war; rewriting a 21st century tax code; redesigning government, according to constitutional precepts; restoring the federal judiciary to its proper and constitutional place; and, cultivating our society’s culture of life.

It seems to me it is the responsibility of the national leadership of the conservative movement and the Republican Party to rally the nation around these goals, but it is the responsibility of a thousand candidates and activists to define them. Conservatism dominated politics in the 1990s and early 2000s because it was reinforced through substantive policy debates in the 1970s and ’80s. If Republicans want to win more elections, they have to start re-fighting the battle of ideas the way we did before successive victories made us soft.

The five principles: victory in the war on terror, fundamental tax reform, government re-imagination, constitutional jurisprudence, and a culture of life are big enough tents to host all sorts of substantive, internal debates. Questions like “What does victory in the war on terror look like?” and “If we had to create a health care or retirement system from scratch, what would it look like?” will never be asked, let alone answered by liberals. Conservatives are at their best – and do their best for our country – when they are hashing out the specific details of a concrete agenda to redesign our government.

Republicans are actually in an excellent position to embark on such a course right now. What with an unpopular president, an unorthodox presidential nominee, congressional conferences bottoming out in terms of their numbers of safe seats, and only a handful of well-known rising stars in the states, conventional wisdom says the Republican Party is a mess. I don’t see that at all. What pundits see as disunity can be very easily transformed into creative competition.

House Republicans remain the core of Washington conservatism. And even under the dictatorial methods of Speaker Pelosi, they can and should promote specific legislative alternatives to every major bill the Democrats put forward. Without the responsibilities of a majority party, minority Republicans in the House can work with leading conservatives from around the country to devise specific reforms of our health care, immigration, budget, energy, and tax systems. They can force the Democrats to go on the record about the war on terror, marriage, and the proper role of faith in the public square. Through the vote you regain your stature and credibility. Meanwhile, individual candidates from around the country can interpret conservative principles to best suit their own districts.

Senate Republicans, and Republican Senate candidates, can and should do the same. The McCain campaign already is developing its own agenda, independent from either congressional Republicans or the White House. Meanwhile, grassroots organizations and independent groups should be informing all of the above and activating their members to do the same. This shouldn’t be feared, but embraced.

Indeed, for a conservative agenda to be truly robust and practical, it must be driven both inside and outside the official channels of political institutions. As important as House, Senate, and campaign Republicans are, independent conservative groups, coalitions, and activists are our movement’s spine and sinew. Official Republicans should encourage outside organizations to help develop and drive a new conservative agenda. Furthermore, these outside conservative organizations and activists should work as closely together as possible to unify conservatives of all stripes from all over the country to redesign our government, secure our nation, and promote a culture of family and life in our society. Candidates and campaigns aren’t enough. To be successful, any new conservative agenda may be defined from the top-down, but it must be driven from the bottom-up.

Only through such an inside-outside strategy of ideas and mobilization can conservatism find itself again, drive an agenda for a Constitutional government, regain the mantle of the “Party of Ideas,” and deserve, at least, another chance at national leadership.

The country has not lost its intuitive faith in conservatism; it is simply waiting for a reason to restore its trust in conservatives.