CBP and ICE Chiefs Faced Off Against Unhinged Dems...and One Said the Quiet...
Democrat Presidential Hopeful Has Been Telling Some Weird Lies About His Ancestor and...
DOJ Charges Two Men in $120 Million Adult Day Care Fraud Scheme
This GOP Governor Just Shot Down a Bill That Would Have Banned Biological...
Chewing the Fat on the Left's 'Body Positivity' Flip Flop
National Nurses Union Calls for the Abolition of ICE
While Her Senate Rivals Campaign Statewide, Haley Stevens Hides From Voters
Delaware Smacked Down for Trying to Enforce Law, Ignoring Injunction
Dow 50,000: A Supply-Side Miracle
Tensions Rise At the White House's New Religious Liberty Commission as One Member...
Mike Johnson Blasts Mamdani's DOH for Creating a ‘Global Oppression’ Group Focused on...
Kentucky Senate Candidate Andy Barr Endorses Pro-Amnesty Book Despite Pledging to Be ‘Amer...
Even CNN Knows That Democrats Are on the Wrong Side of the Voter...
Ken Paxton Notches Immigration Win As Premier Community for Illegals Pays Out $68...
This Congressman's Inquiry Into Bad Bunny's Explicit Performance Has the Libs Screaming
OPINION

If You Don't See the Baby, Is It Still a Baby?

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

I can’t count the number of times I’ve heard a variation of the riddle – “If a tree falls in the forest and there’s no one there to hear it, does it make a sound?” While it’s usually made in jest, those who pose it seriously are seeking an answer to whether the objective world operates in a fixed manner regardless of whether anyone sees what occurs within it.

Advertisement

The American Civil Liberties Union is offering us a 21st century rendition of this riddle in North Carolina, where they’ve pulled out all stops to keep women from viewing ultrasound pictures of their babies in the womb before deciding whether to abort them. The ACLU asks, “If you don’t see the baby, is it still a baby?”

The point of contention for the ACLU is the North Carolina Woman’s Right to Know Act, H.B. 854, which was enacted in July after the state’s general assembly overrode Gov. Bev Perdue’s veto of the bill. It requires an obstetric ultrasound examination and explanation four to 72 hours “before the administration of any anesthesia or medication in preparation for the abortion on the woman.” However, the law does not require that women look at the displayed images, listen to the baby’s heartbeat, or listen to the doctor’s explanations if she does not wish to. She remains free to deny the evidence of her senses, if she so chooses.

Why is the ACLU so worked up over the fact that North Carolina is still giving women a choice? One can only conclude that its real concern is that those who choose to view the ultrasound will do what tens of thousands of other women have done across the country: they will choose life over the abortionist’s scalpel.

Advertisement

Don’t doubt it, friends. Just as a tree falling in the woods makes noise when it crashes into the limbs of other trees and eventually impacts the ground—whether we hear it or not—so too a baby remains a baby whether or not her mother sees her on an ultrasound screen.

The ACLU would prefer that mothers continue to doubt, rather than see and believe. That leaves them vulnerable to Planned Parenthood’s tired old lie that “It’s just a clump of cells,” and maximizes profit for the abortion industry at the expense of human life.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement