Terrorists Launch Attacks on Americans Building Biden’s Gaza Pier
The Pro-Hamas Activist Who Accosted Alec Baldwin Went Totally Insane During Piers Morgan...
Police at UT Austin Had the Perfect Response to a Pro-Hamas Activist Flipping...
Iran-Backed Terrorists Resume Attacks on U.S. Service Members in the Middle East
White House Attempt to Cover for Biden's Latest Gaffe Might Be Its Most...
Stocks Tank After Disastrous First Quarter GDP Report
US, 17 Other Nations Issue Joint Statement Calling on Hamas to Release Hostages
Florida Has Carried Out an Impressive Evacuation Operation in Haiti
Biden Administration's New Overtime Rule Blasted as an 'Attack on Small Businesses'
Students at Another Ivy League University Get Ready to Set Up Encampment
The Left Would Prosecute Trump for Acts He Never Committed, But Obama Did
Another Poll on Battleground States Is Here to Toss Cold Water on Biden's...
Could Texas Ban ‘Gender Nonconforming’ Teachers From Schools?
Should Republicans Be Concerned About the Pennsylvania Primary Results?
Mike Davis' Internet Accountability Project Calls on Senate Republicans to Break Up Big...
OPINION

If You Don't See the Baby, Is It Still a Baby?

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

I can’t count the number of times I’ve heard a variation of the riddle – “If a tree falls in the forest and there’s no one there to hear it, does it make a sound?” While it’s usually made in jest, those who pose it seriously are seeking an answer to whether the objective world operates in a fixed manner regardless of whether anyone sees what occurs within it.

Advertisement

The American Civil Liberties Union is offering us a 21st century rendition of this riddle in North Carolina, where they’ve pulled out all stops to keep women from viewing ultrasound pictures of their babies in the womb before deciding whether to abort them. The ACLU asks, “If you don’t see the baby, is it still a baby?”

The point of contention for the ACLU is the North Carolina Woman’s Right to Know Act, H.B. 854, which was enacted in July after the state’s general assembly overrode Gov. Bev Perdue’s veto of the bill. It requires an obstetric ultrasound examination and explanation four to 72 hours “before the administration of any anesthesia or medication in preparation for the abortion on the woman.” However, the law does not require that women look at the displayed images, listen to the baby’s heartbeat, or listen to the doctor’s explanations if she does not wish to. She remains free to deny the evidence of her senses, if she so chooses.

Why is the ACLU so worked up over the fact that North Carolina is still giving women a choice? One can only conclude that its real concern is that those who choose to view the ultrasound will do what tens of thousands of other women have done across the country: they will choose life over the abortionist’s scalpel.

Advertisement

Don’t doubt it, friends. Just as a tree falling in the woods makes noise when it crashes into the limbs of other trees and eventually impacts the ground—whether we hear it or not—so too a baby remains a baby whether or not her mother sees her on an ultrasound screen.

The ACLU would prefer that mothers continue to doubt, rather than see and believe. That leaves them vulnerable to Planned Parenthood’s tired old lie that “It’s just a clump of cells,” and maximizes profit for the abortion industry at the expense of human life.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos