Judge in Luigi Mangione Case Issues Ruling on Evidence
Jeanine Pirro Issues Threat to Parents of Children Who Participate in 'Teen Takeovers'
Trump Moves to Drop $10 Billion Lawsuit Against IRS
Remember That Six-Year-Old Who Shot a Teacher? Well...
Jon Ossoff Backs Anti-Voter ID, Soft on Crime Georgia Supreme Court Candidate Jen...
CDC Issues Entry Ban for Certain African Countries As WHO Declares Ebola Outbreak...
President Trump Takes Aim at Thomas Massie on the Eve of Kentucky's Primary
Amy Klobuchar Sent an Innocent Man to Prison, Now Minnesota Taxpayers Are on...
Woman Behind 'Feeding Our Future' Fraud Points the Finger at Minnesota Democrats
President Trump Just Made a Major Announcement About Iran
Stacey Abrams Admits Democrats Are Losing the Redistricting Battle—and It Goes Far Beyond...
Mamdani Reveals What He Believes Are the Nine Most Terrifying Words in the...
Iran Is Now Dumping Its Oil Into the Sea
Karen Bass Is Terrified of Spencer Pratt, and Everyone Knows It
Active Shooter Situation On-Going at Islamic Center of San Diego
OPINION

I Want to Give $100

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
I Want to Give $100

We hear a lot of talk about how requiring someone to show a valid photo I.D. before voting is “unfair.” Yet whenever I ask those protesting this common sense notion why it’s “unfair” I’ve never received a valid answer.

Advertisement

And “because it is” isn’t a valid answer.

The sports talk radio station in my hometown demands you show valid photo I.D. before claiming a prize you won on the air. Foreign countries require you to show a valid photo I.D. before crossing their borders. Last year’s Democrat National Convention required valid photo I.D. to be admitted, yet many of the speakers at the event are opposed to requiring voters to do the same.

One argument I’ve heard is “you shouldn’t have to show photo I.D. to access your rights.” If that’s the case, then I assume those making such an argument believe you ought to have a right to a job if someone’s willing to hire you, right? Well, guess what you have to provide beginning the first day of work? Valid photo I.D. (as well as a valid Social Security card) in order to fill out your W-2.

I’m also guessing those same people think you have a right to marry anybody you want, right? Well, guess what you have to show in order to obtain a marriage license? That’s right, valid photo I.D.

I’m guessing those same people want someone to show valid photo I.D. – if not be subjected to an extensive background check – before purchasing a firearm, right? So if you think I’m required to show valid photo I.D. before accessing my God-given right to self-defense, then why shouldn’t you show valid photo I.D. before accessing your Constitutionally-given right to vote?

Advertisement

It just doesn’t make any sense to me. I can’t come up with a valid reason why it’s unfair to require someone to show a valid photo I.D. before voting. Especially when that vote often determines how much you’re able to pick your neighbor’s pocket.

So that’s where perhaps at least one of you comes in.

I will give $100 out of my pocket to the first person that can give me one valid reason why it’s “unfair” to require valid photo I.D. in order to vote. Simply email me at steve@stevedeace.com. If you’re the first person to provide one, I’ll give you $100—right out of my own pocket.

Now, I must warn you. I tried to do this on my nationally-syndicated radio show this week, and no one could do it. If you think you’re up to the challenge, here’s your chance. After all, “unfair” should be easy to prove, right?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement