Democrats Stunned to Find Out Not Everyone Loves Them
How Private Is Private?
Liz Cheney for President?
No Freedom Without Virtue, Part One
The FBI's Outrageous Probe of 'Radical Catholics'
Our Ticking Ethnic Time Bomb
Stop the #MeToo Lawsuit Carnival
Biden and the 'Existential Threat'
O'Connor's Parting Dissents Highlighted the Twin Perils of Local Tyranny and Federal Overr...
The Meaning of an Astronaut’s Passing
The Prescription to Cure Hospital’s Latest Patient-Gouging Scheme? Site-Neutral Pricing.
Judicial Tyranny Worsens in D.C.
Stop Lecturing Us on Palestinian Civilians
Life Without Fossil Fuels Would Be Unimaginably Miserable
Democrats Are Truly in Disarray Over Israel

Google's Acquisition of Waze Reveals 2016 Secrets

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of

Google’s acquisition of Waze hints at decisive digital technology shifts for the next presidential election. At about the same time, the Republican National Committee has hired young Andy Barkett from Facebook as their new Chief Technology Officer.


Why does Waze matter? For those just returned from the ISS, Waze, which crowdsources mapping, is a big breakthrough. It is going to change how we live. Of far greater significance to business and will change how we shop.

How is this relevant to politics? Because the more you know about your customers (in politics, voters), the better you can serve them and the more you (and they) will thrive. Facebook, now severely handicapped by its limited mobile capabilities as recently explained in the Atlantic, begins to look like the wave of the past.

The RNC recruited Barkett from, most recently, a brief gig at Facebook. According to the HuffPo:

In 2006, Barkett went to work for Google, where he was a technical program manager for two years. During that same period, he co-founded Greenlight Apparel, a “fair-trade, organic clothing company.”

Barkett left Google in 2008. He was a senior IT management consultant at Taos Mountain Inc. for several months, then a senior director for engineering at Livescribe Inc. for almost two years. In January 2011, Facebook hired Barkett as an engineering manager.

GOP technorati wish Barkett well. The big question being quietly asked has little to do with his qualifications. It is whether Chairman Priebus really will give him the level of authority (and the political heat shield) he needs to get the job done. The Obama campaign gave its ubergeek Harper Reed serious authority. The RNC has a history of undermining the authority of its tech execs. Will Chairman Priebus protect Barkett from meddling by clueless National Committee people (on a majority of whose votes Mr. Priebus’s chairmanship depends)? Barkett’s technical credentials are impeccable.


The jury, necessarily at this stage, remains out on his strategic political cred. Facebook, his most recent gig, is built on what are called “weak bonds.”

Harper Reed got his chops from Threadless uses a vastly different model of user engagement than does Facebook. Threadless is a crowdsourcing icon in a way that Facebook is not. This columnist calls Facebook the “High School Cafeteria of the Internet.” Waze is the wave of the future. Threadless, as crowdsourced, is fundamentally different, too, from Barkett’s Greenlight Apparel -- a good but generically top down business-to-consumer e-commerce business.

What do Threadless, Narwhal (the Obama 2012 campaign tech) and, yes, Waze have in common (that Facebook, Greenlight, and Romney 2012’s Orca do not)? Crowdsourcing. Crowdsourcing is geek speak for honoring the American principle known as subsidiarity: delegating authority to the front lines. Subsidiarity is at the tactical heart of the left’s recurring victories.

Central planning vs. subsidiarity is critical to winning. Weirdly, it is the libertarian faction that is pushing central planning on the Grand Old Party. And not just in tech.

The LA Times recently wrote a defining piece about the GOP’s cognitive dissonance, covering a 3-day retreat for big money GOP donors hosted by Mitt Romney.

“Looking ahead to the 2014 congressional races and the 2016 presidential contest, many Romney donors said they were concerned about the ease with which sharply conservative Republican candidates...had tainted the party’s image.

“A number of donors also said damage persisted from Romney’s shift to the right on issues such as...his emphasis on his opposition to gay marriage.


“The views expressed by many donors in interviews this week about the direction the party should take stood in stark contrast to the current concerns of the 168 members of the Republican National Committee, who determine the party platform and its rules.

“At an RNC gathering this spring in Hollywood, committee Chairman Reince Priebus had hoped to keep the focus on the party’s rebuilding efforts after being vastly outmanned by Obama’s campaign operation, including the Democrats’ sophisticated voter identification systems and the strength of their ground organization in the key swing states."

“Instead, many RNC members wanted to talk about how the party should not stray from its core principles on social issues, which remain singularly important to many party activists. During the meeting, RNC members unanimously pushed through a resolution affirming that marriage should be between a man and a woman.”


It is crucial for the Republicans to resolve this predicament -- the tension between its two key factions. If it fails to do so the party will end up paralyzed by what psychologists call “learned helplessness.”

There is a straightforward resolution. The GOP thrives when, and only when, it is able to persuade its conservative and libertarian factions to collaborate. When the GOP has thrived in modern times it has been thanks to a doctrine called fusionism, formulated by the great Frank Meyer, described by E.J. Dionne as “utilizing libertarian means in a conservative society for traditionalist ends.”

For the GOP to seek to distance itself from its activist base makes as little political sense as would the Democratic Party ejecting, or marginalizing, its progressive base. Alienating oneself from one's base is a recipe for political suicide. The suicidal implications, apparently, are not self-evident to many low-information GOP donors.

Yes, the Republican party really needs to transform its tech game to help it get the voters on its side. Of even greater importance, however, the GOP needs to transform itself into a force that will embrace both, rather than seek to marginalize one, of its two key factions. How?

Rampant progressives are carrying out an across-the-board assault on our constitutional rights. The First Amendment’s guarantees of freedom of speech are under assault from progressives hellbent on repealing Citizens United. Freedom of the press is under assault under the euphemism of “net neutrality.” Freedom of religion is under assault from those who seek to “define devotion down” to mere liturgy. Freedom to peaceably assemble and petition the government for the redress of grievances recently was under (and remains vulnerable to) violent assault by the IRS.


The Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms remains under shameless recurring progressive assault. The Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable search are being violated, in spirit if not in letter, by massive government surveillance. The Fifth Amendment holds that “no person shall be … deprived of life … without due process of law.” The Supreme Court blithely withdrew that protection from persons awaiting transit through the birth canal. It then sustained its withdrawal on the extra-constitutional (and philosophically incoherent) grounds of “the mystery of human life.”

The federal government is clearly infringing on our constitutional rights. Constitutionalism is the only worldview in complete philosophical accord with free market principles. A valiant stand for constitutionalism will unite the party and the country.

The GOP can get right with both of its key factions also by leaning on the Declaration of Independence -- life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness -- replacing the Declaration’s 18th-century bill of particulars with a litany of 21st century outrages. Republican moneyed elites have not thought through the politically suicidal prescription of marginalizing the party’s base. But these are smart people -- dummies rarely get rich. The party elite can be brought around to a smart strategy of valiant constitutionalism -- which is as modern and hip as anything the Democrats have to offer.


Dignity -- for the rank and file and for the citizen -- is the solid foundation for both digital campaign tech, crowdsourcing, and policy. An elegant convergence beckons. Good tech respects the dignity of activists and operatives. Constitutionalism respects the dignity of citizens.

The proposition that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom -- and that government of the people, by the people, for the people shall not perish from the earth -- is the lost soul of the GOP. It is time for the GOP to regain its soul. It can do so by catching the clue train about "of, by and for the people"...from the Waze Craze.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos