In the past, advertising was a tool to increase sales. Then advertisers began to see themselves as artists. Today, they see themselves as missionaries for a “better world.”
David Ogilvy, the legendary British advertising guru (1911–1999), had a very clear idea of what good advertising should look like. Good advertising, he repeatedly emphasized, must do one thing above all else: sell. That sounds like a no-brainer, but Ogilvy had to increasingly fight against a different concept: “creatives,” who saw advertising primarily as entertainment. Whether their ads actually resulted in more of a product being sold wasn’t that important to them. They were not primarily interested in getting consumers to embrace a product, they sought recognition from their colleagues in the advertising industry.
The primary goal of many advertisers, as Ogilvy criticized in his classic Confessions of an Advertising Man, was to win awards for their creativity. They didn’t care one bit whether their spots increased sales, provided they were entertaining and won awards. These creative entertainers had done immeasurable damage to the advertising industry, he repeatedly lamented in speeches and interviews.
Eventually, Ogilvy banned his employees from entering award contests, which sparked a small mutiny within his company. Ogilvy countered by establishing his own award – for results. The David Ogilvy Award was given to the campaign that demonstrably did the most to boost a client’s sales or their reputation. Ultimately, however, he was unable to maintain the ban on taking part in award contests. Nevertheless, he did maintain his opinion that most campaigns that delivered real sales increases never won an award.
Recommended
Many “creatives” feel called to greater things. Some even see themselves as unrecognized artistic geniuses – after all, Andy Warhol also started out as a commercial artist and became world famous for his soup cans.
Today we have gone one step further. “Advertising to increase sales and profits” – in an age when profit is considered immoral – is a goal advertising people widely reject. Apparently, advertising is no longer about promoting a product’s benefits in order to increase sales. Entertainment is also not enough. No, advertising must proclaim political messages and re-educate people.
A few years ago, Gillette prompted a backlash with its campaign against “toxic masculinity.” It is because of the traditional toxic image of masculinity, Gillette claimed, that children bully each other, men sexually harass women, and male employees do not let their female colleagues have a say. While the ads generated a lot of attention, they certainly didn’t help sell more products.
Mars announced that its M&M candies would be moving away from only one “body size” – to create more respect for the real-world diversity of body shapes. In addition, less emphasis is being placed on the gender of the candies and more is being done to highlight their nuanced personalities. For example, one of the female M&Ms is now dressed in sneakers instead of high heels in order to reflect her confidence and empowerment as a strong female, the company said.
The Calvin Klein brand, which previously ran adverts featuring attractive women and men with great figures, also joined the woke trend and instead ran a campaign featuring an overweight man and an overweight woman – the man has a beard and is wearing a bra. Responses to the photoshoot were predominantly negative. The tweet: “Calvin Klein wants to go bankrupt” by the doctor Anastasia Maria Loupis was viewed seven million times. She was referring to the ad, which features a trans man living in The Netherlands – Bappie Kortram – alongside the plus-size model Jamilla Grannetia. Both are wearing the brand’s sports bras. The campaign sparked predominantly negative comments: “Which women should this appeal to?” was asked thousands of times on social media.
The American beer brand Bud Light also caused its own advertising disaster when it launched a politically correct and woke advertising campaign, prompting sales and the company’s share price to plummet. The company achieved its goal of generating a lot of attention, but attention in itself is of no value if you alienate the actual target group that your product is intended to appeal to.
It’s impossible to pinpoint exactly when all this started, but Benetton’s legendary advertising definitely marked a turning point. The Italian fashion brand shocked consumers in the late 1980s with large billboards depicting child labor, a blood-soaked T-shirt from a war zone, and an electric chair. Each image appeared with the Italian clothing manufacturer’s logo. The advertising industry still celebrates this campaign and its creator, Oliviero Toscani. For the company, this campaign represented a financial fiasco from which it has not really recovered to this day.
Advertising people do not measure the “success” of their campaigns on any increase in sales they might achieve, but rather on the approval of the politically conformist left-wing advertising industry. No industry is as uniform in thought as the creative industry, censures the well-known German brand expert Oliver Errichiello.
The only absurd thing is that the CEOs of large companies allow these “creatives” to convince them that this is what advertising should look like today. No one says: “The emperor has no clothes.” Some opportunistically follow every fashion, others are afraid of a “sh*tstorm” and being targeted by left-wing, woke “activists.” But such campaigns actually do much less damage to a company’s sales than a failed marketing strategy that forgets that the whole point is to sell a product.
Even the biggest scandals and media witch-hunts cannot harm a company if the product is good. Behind Toyota, VW is one of the world’s leading automobile brands. After the VW “Dieselgate” scandal of 2015, when the German car manufacturer used special software to cheat on emissions tests and deceive consumers, universal prophecies of doom claimed the company had destroyed its own brand and was facing a “fight for survival.” But consumers don’t evaluate brands or products according to the same yardsticks as woke marketing strategists.
Today, VW is the most trusted car brand in Germany. In 2016, the year after the emissions scandal, VW sold more cars than at any point in its existence. My prediction: If VW ever destroys itself, it will probably be because it opportunistically conforms to the dominant environmental spirit of the times and offers no resistance to the EU’s ban on combustion engines from 2035.
Consumers’ decisions are based on completely different criteria than advertising people think. If you watch commercials that constantly mention “sustainable,” “save the planet,” or even “diverse” and “vegan,” you get the impression that the companies believe that the normal population is also thoroughly “woke.” That’s not the case.
The tide has now changed and people in more and more countries have become skeptical about the green ideology. But that won’t impress the missionaries in the advertising agencies. If I were to start an advertising agency today, I would do so with the promise that my advertising campaigns would be guaranteed not to be sustainable, woke or green, but would be aimed exclusively at consumers and their needs in order to sell more products for my clients.
Rainer Zitelmann is the author of the book In Defense of Capitalism https://in-defense-of-capitalism.com/
Join the conversation as a VIP Member