A Few Simple Snarky Rules to Make Life Better
Jamie Raskin's Low Opinion of Women
Thank You, GOD!
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 306: ‘Fear Not' Old Testament – Part 2
The War on Warring
Jasmine Crockett Finally Added Some Policy to Her Website and it Was a...
No Sanctuary in the Sanctuary
Chromosomes Matter — and Women’s Sports Prove It
The Economy Will Decide Congress — If Republicans Actually Talk About It
The Real United States of America
These Athletes Are Getting Paid to Shame Their Own Country at the Olympics
WaPo CEO Resigns Days After Laying Off 300 Employees
Georgia's Jon Ossoff Says Trump Administration Imitates Rhetoric of 'History's Worst Regim...
U.S. Thwarts $4 Million Weapons Plot Aimed at Toppling South Sudan Government
Minnesota Mom, Daughter, and Relative Allegedly Stole $325k from SNAP
OPINION

A Possible Judicial Solution to Re-imposition of the So-called "Fairness Doctrine"

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

I have been feeling rather blue. Those who know me know that I never give up without a fight. My problem is with the so-called "Fairness Doctrine," which represents the opposite of fairness. Talk Radio, as we now know it, represents one of the very few weapons in the conservative media arsenal. 630 WMAL's brilliant commentator, Chris Plante, has declared that 2008 is the year that true journalism died in the United States of America. I agree with him. The national media overwhelmingly supports Senator Barack H. Obama (D-IL), the presumed Democratic nominee, for President. How can he lose with the national media all but carrying his bags as he goes abroad? With the exception of Fox News Channel the television media is all in the hands of the left. Fox itself is more Republican than conservative. The left also controls nearly all of the print media.

Advertisement

So I reviewed conservative options for the next Congress. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-NV) have two ways to achieve their objective, which is to pass the Fairness Doctrine. First, they can deny opponents the opportunity for an up-or-down vote (which they have done in the present Congress). They do so because they correctly fear that anti-Fairness Doctrine Members would prevail. Test votes have so indicated. Second, they could wait for the Democrats to win complete control of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and then let it reinstate the doctrine. It took President Ronald W. Reagan seven years to accomplish de-regulation. Rush Limbaugh launched nationally in 1988. My guess is that the Democratic Leadership will not want to wait that long, lest opposition grow throughout the country.

I did not see a way out of this situation until I interviewed Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) last week on the "Right Hour" program on the Right Talk Radio Network. McConnell pointed to the record of the Supreme Court under Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. In ruling after ruling the Court is suspicious of any legislation which tries to limit political free speech and our First Amendment rights. McConnell has been the plaintiff in the most important cases before the Court. He believes that with a few more rulings and McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance Reform will belong to the ashbin of history.

Advertisement

I had not considered the Supreme Court's role in the Fairness Doctrine. There is little doubt that if the Fairness Doctrine is re-instated by Congress it immediately will attract many free-speech lawsuits. Seldom is it that a United States Senator says anything to cheer me up. Congratulations, Mitch McConnell. You managed to just do that.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement