YouTuber Ms Rachel Just Cut a Campaign Check. Take a Wild Guess of...
Dems Know They Probably Should've Kept This Poll Private, Right?
Disbarred for Defending Trump: ACLJ Takes the Fight to the Supreme Court
New York Times Puts Brutal Dictator on Its Fashion List, Then Quietly Deletes...
USA Today Gets Tripped by Its Caitlin Clark Opposition. AP Weeps We No...
Thought Crimes Come to Minnesota
Long Island Residents Object to All-Boys Muslim Boarding School in Their Neighborhood
Freddy, Everyone's Favorite German Tourist, Bids America Farewell
Forcing Assisted Suicide Is Unconstitutional
Bosnian War Crimes Suspect Indicted for Lying on U.S. Citizenship Application
Whitmer Endorses Stevens Over Socialist El-Sayed in Michigan Senate Primary
Florida Financier Sentenced to 20 Years for Laundering Funds Tied to Haitian Assassination
Two Georgia Men Plead Guilty in $550,000 New York Film Tax Credit Scam
NM Woman Pleads Guilty in $3.9 Million Medicaid Transportation Fraud Scheme
Trump Demands Key 'Reconciliation 3.0' Step Passed Before August Recess
OPINION

Death of an Artist: the Actor of His Generation

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Death of an Artist: the Actor of His Generation

It's a succession of sensations Americans have come to know all too well in these sad cases: shock, then grief, then the details nobody really wants to know. A detail like the needle found in Philip Seymour Hoffman's arm when a couple of his discovered the actor's body over the weekend.

In all the reams of details and tributes, just what we have lost may get lost itself. How could this Philip Seymour Hoffman get inside so many mysterious, ominous, soul-destroying characters? His range was as wide as the Pacific Ocean's. How could he fathom all those types, yet leave them unfathomable? That may be his lasting legacy as an actor. He didn't just capture the outrageous but the timid, able to play one role with wild flamboyance, another with restraint -- even a restrained restraint.

How did Philip Seymour Hoffman do it? Our theory is that he explored the evils of our nature because he himself was so ... decent. For he was one of the few actors who, once off-stage or off-camera, made quiet, unassuming sense whenever he was interviewed. He didn't sound like a fool actor far beyond his depth. Maybe because he was one contemporary celebrity I can't ever remember talking politics.

Just where the artificial line between being an actor and a character actor is drawn has never been clear. But if there is such a distinction, Philip Seymour Hoffman mastered both callings. Maybe because he not only had talent but studied, studied, studied -- not just the lines he spoke or the characters he played or the book or script from which the character and story were drawn, but some inner essence he found there.

Someone once described genius as the capacity for taking infinite pains. Maybe that was the secret, or one of them, of Philip Seymour Hoffman's genius.

In his own way, this singular actor and artist of his generation confirmed Plato's theory that acting isn't an art at all, but a kind of divine fit -- a visitation of the gods that transforms the actor. And transfixes the audience, even now, in grateful memory.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement