Will The Democrats Let Donald Trump Be President If He Wins?
After Getting Demolished in South Carolina, Nikki Haley Loses a Major Donor
Latest Development About the Illegal Alien in the Georgia Student Murder Story Is...
Nikki Haley, Read The Writing On The Wall
You Own Nothing
Stress Promises Not Attacks
America Reaching Open Border Boiling Point
The Country is a Mess Because Voters Asked for It
Polls Show Americans Support Militarizing the Border and a Detain and Deport Policy
Lessons From the 1980 Presidential Elections
ICE Confirms Illegal Migrant Accused of Killing College Student Was Previously Arrested In...
After Trump Dominated South Carolina, Biden Reminds Americans the ‘Threat’ He Poses
DeSantis Ramps Up His Efforts to Put Joe Biden’s Border Crisis to Bed
Attacks On Churches Spike Nearly 800 Percent As the Left Pushes Its Anti-God...
Trump Spent $1.3 Million In South Carolina, Nikki Haley Spent $16.5-- And Trump...

Let Freedom Ring!

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

How about that? Not just Barack Obama can "reset" American policy toward Russia, or give it more "flexibility," to quote his not-so-confidential promise to that country's newest czar. (Our president didn't realize he was talking into an open mike at the time.) It turns out that, in this remarkably well-designed government of divided powers, Est. 1787, Congress can do a little resetting itself.


Now that co-equal branch of government has reset the terms of trade with Russia, formerly the Soviet Union of unlamented memory, sic semper tryannis. Congress even got the president to sign on to the effort.

This latest outbreak of courage and principle on Congress' part is called the Magnitsky Bill -- in honor of Sergei Magnitsky, a crusading Russian lawyer who exposed a fraudulent tax scheme on the part of Vladimir Putin's oh-so-new-and-different regime. Counselor Magnitsky's reward? He died in a Soviet -- excuse me, Russian -- prison after being tortured.

In exchange for relaxing trade restrictions on Russia, the Magnitsky Bill denies visas to any Russian officials involved in Sergei Magnitsky's torture or any other abuses of human rights -- and also prevents them from transferring their considerable assets via the American banking system.

Yikes, that must hurt Russia's new oligarchs. No wonder they're fuming and threatening dire repercussions. Like what? Like our no longer being able to buy a nifty Russian car like a Lada in this country? Also known as a Lada Junk, it came with heated rear windows -- so your hands woudn't get cold pushing it. (When he made a well-publicized appearance to advertise the latest model Lada, it took Vladimir Putin only five times or so to start the thing.)


This isn't the first time Congress has taken a stand for freedom behind the Iron Curtain. Back in another era, it was called the Jackson-Vanik Amendment. The sainted Scoop Jackson, one of the last of the Cold Warriors, was the driving spirit behind that law. Its terms were simple: No free trade for the Soviets without free emigration for its people, including its long-oppressed Jews.

By 1987, there was a "new" Russia, and its leader -- Mikhail Gorbachev -- was preparing to honor us with a state visit. Remember him? He was going to open up and completely reform Soviet Communism, as if a criminal conspiracy from its very origins and down to its very roots could be reformed by repeating magic words --Glasnost! Perestroika!

Comrade Gobachev didn't realize there was no more hope of "reforming" Communism than of reforming any other malignant cancer. As he would soon find out -- and become a former secretary-general of the former Communist Party of the now happily former Soviet Union, formally the Union of Soviet Socialist "Republics."

But he was still riding high as he headed for Washington early in December of 1987, where a different kind of welcome awaited him: a rally on the National Mall on behalf of Russia's captive Jews. The Soviets did their best to dismiss its importance. As his KGB interrogators told one of their better known prisoners, the ever-defiant Anatoly Sharansky, the demonstration on the Mall represented just "a bunch of students and housewives."


This country's own Jewish establishment had its reservations about the wisdom of such a display in the nation's capital. How many people could it attract, not being held in New York City with its large Jewish population to draw from? Why make a scene and risk upsetting our own State Department? The experts at Foggy Bottom were still pushing Detente, that decade's version of appeasement, which had acquired a bad name since the 1930s. (When a policy is a proven failure, the State Department changes not the policy but its name.)

By the time the Soviet leader was due to arrive, the demonstration was set. Suppose it attracted only a few thousand? Suppose no one of note showed up? Wouldn't it turn out to be more of an embarrassment than a cry for freedom?

Well, on that cold December day in 1987, the National Mall was packed. Not just 2,000 or 25,000 but 250,000 demonstrators had materialized on the Mall, among them Anatoly Sharansky and other just-released prisoners of conscience. The vice president of the United States, George H.W. Bush, was there to welcome the throng. Americans from all over the country, of all faiths and political persuasions, united by a common belief in freedom, had poured out in their multitudes. Some little bunch of students and housewives. And they say the age of miracles is over.


I knew a lady in Pine Bluff, Ark., who flew up to the rally with her little boy to wave paper flags emblazoned with the word Svoboda! in Cyrillic lettering. Freedom! Soon the vast crowd was repeating the ancient cry: Let My People Go!

And soon enough this pharaoh had to yield, too. The gates were opened, and millions of Russian Jews, having learned from the fate of European Jewry under Hitler, would leave the Soviet Union while the leaving was good. They headed for Israel, for America, for any place they could get in, dwarfing the original biblical Exodus. A detailed history of the whole, improbable story takes its title from a popular saying among Soviet Jews at the time: "When They Come For Us, We'll Be Gone." And they were.

The news of the great demonstration in Washington cheered Russia's refuseniks, those Jews who had been denied exit visas for years, and sent a thrill through every captive nation behind the still Iron Curtain, just as when an American president had dared call an evil empire evil. By the time Comrade Gorbachev met that president at the White House the next day, Ronald Reagan could tell him that public opinion wouldn't let him support free trade with Russia without free emigration for its people.

Talk about deja vu: Once again, the Kremlin is fuming, and the Magnitsky Bill is being called all the usual names: a Flagrant Interference in Russia's Internal Affairs! An anti-Russian Provocation! But those fighting for freedom in that country have hailed the bill as pro-Russian, that is, pro-human rights, pro the Russian people.


In the 1980s, the cry was Let My People Go! Today the message of the Magnitsky Bill to Russia's new czars has been slightly altered, but it's just as simple, just as right, and could prove just as irresistible:

Let Your People Go!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos