Why an Ex-ESPN Reporter's Attempt at Trolling Conservatives Over Bad Bunny Failed Miserabl...
Why Are Americans Fleeing Blue States for Red States?
Let’s Rip Democrats Apart for Fun (and Because They’re Truly Awful)
CBS News Tried to Recalibrate Detention Stats — DHS Was Having None of...
Faith, Not Foul-Mouthed Scolds, Shined at the Grammys
Is There Any Good News Out There?
Has There Been Voter Fraud?
When Canadians Were Actually Funny
The Student ICE Walkouts Are a Troubling Reminder of How Revolutionaries Are Made
America’s Security Doesn’t End at the Ice’s Edge
Talks About Talks: How Tehran Is Buying Time While Washington Hesitates
Girl Scout Cookies vs. the Inverted Food Pyramid
SBA Prioritizes American Citizens for New Loans
Let ICE Do Its Job
Will We Reach 100 Days of Straight Liberal Content on the Apple News...
OPINION

Seattle Wages War on “Very Wealthy” Small Business Owners

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

Seattle might end up having some trouble implementing their dictatorial decree that no employee is worth less than $15 per hour. The Emerald City, in some sort of utopian liberal fog, recently passed legislation raising the minimum wage… And there’s already a lawsuit pending.

Advertisement

Seattle is being sued by the International Franchise Association, because the law requires that “big businesses” – which will include any franchise business – must hike their wages sooner than other small businesses. As a result, franchise owners who operate small businesses throughout the region will be forced to adapt to the new wage requirement on the same increased timetable as large multinational corporations.

The disproportionate impact this law will have on franchisees is in addition to the economically illiterate move for higher minimum wages. So, naturally, the city’s Socialist city council member (I’m not being disparaging – she’s actually a Socialist) feels that everything is right with the world:

Kshama Sawant argued at one public hearing that, “In order to be a franchisee, you have to be very, very wealthy.”

Um… No. You actually don’t. In fact, many franchise owners are just barely getting by. Take for example, Kathy Lyons who poured her life savings into her small franchise. According to Fox News:

Kathy Lyons [a franchisee] says she’s not even close to being rich. She took out a small business loan of $235,000 using her home mortgage as collateral to launch a BrightStar franchise. She invested her life savings of $200,000 into the home health care company and is now afraid she could lose it all.

But even if Seattle’s favorite Socialist councilwoman was right: So what? Most people don’t operate a business with the intention of losing money… As Steve Martin once said, “So… It’s a profit deal!” Business owners don’t offer jobs as a charity – workers are expected to contribute a value above and beyond their wage. That’s kinda how profits are made; and only profits enable businesses to hire workers in the first place. I mean, seriously, do these people think that business owners operate their franchise for the “fun” of balancing budgets, paying taxes, and following ill-informed government policies? Because I can think of far more entertaining ways to blow my life savings.

Advertisement

Maybe Emerald City Socialists don’t understand this fundamental aspect of business ownership, but some liberals get it. David Goldstein, a blogger and advocate for minimum wage hikes, admits that Seattle’s new law will cost jobs… But, apparently, he’s not too concerned:

“If some jobs are lost, but we lift tens of thousands of low-wage workers out of poverty, that’s a net plus in the long run,” said David Goldstein, who runs Horsesass.org.

Wow… His blog’s name is almost as moronic as his economically illiterate statement. According to David, 15 bucks per hour is all it takes to pull someone from poverty. I know this is trite and clichéd, but I’m going to say it anyway: Let’s make minimum wage 100 dollars per hour… Then we’ll really see some benefit; because, as David points out, wages happen in a vacuum, right? I mean, businesses won’t be motivated, in the slightest, to increase prices or anything… (Any word on that sarcasm font?)

A big part of what people like David seem to miss, is that business owners don’t ultimately bear the burden of labor expenses… Consumers do. Maybe this is a little too complex for readers of Karl Marx to grasp, but workers are not paid by a company or a rich guy with a cigar and pin-stripe suit. Ultimately, customers (including all those low-wage laborers who David and Kshama claim to champion) are the ones who provide the business with the profits needed to distribute payroll. With that in mind, what do you think will happen when payroll costs go up?

Advertisement

But, I guess “good politics” trump economic truths. This experiment in fascism (and, yes, I’m using that term with perfect accuracy) will do little more than hike prices, increase unemployment, and bankrupt job-creators.

But I guess after Kathy Lyons goes out of business, she can try to get a job flipping burgers for $15 per hour.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement