Opinion

FDA’s Unjust War on Vaping

|
Posted: Sep 22, 2018 12:01 AM
The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent the views of Townhall.com.
FDA’s Unjust War on Vaping

Actor William H. Macy once claimed that film industry rating boards have “a perverted point of view about what’s appropriate for children,” decrying the boards’ need to protect children from sexual content while “think[ing] almost any level of violence is okay for children.”

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is also guilty of this hypocritical stance. In September, the agency declared a “youth vaping epidemic,” even though vaping has been proven to help people stop using much more dangerous tobacco products. In its crusade toprotect the children, FDA has mounted an assault against tobacco harm reduction (THR), and it has even hinted that it may restrict THR access to adult users, too.

Meanwhile, a real epidemic, one that killed more than49,000 Americans in 2017, continues to engulf the United States: the opioid crisis. And FDA—the agency supposedly“responsible for protecting the public health”—remains silent as a mouse.

Federal action (or lack thereof) on the opioid crisis goes back to 2002, when aSenate hearingwas called to assess the risks and benefits of OxyContin. OxyContin is a prescription opioid painkiller manufactured by Purdue Pharma, one of several defendants in more than100 lawsuitsin states and localities in which plaintiffs are alleging drugmakers were irresponsible in their marketing and distribution of prescription opiates. FDA was a witness in the 2002 hearing, as well as several OxyContin-addicted users.

Youth abuse of prescription opioid painkillers was specifically addressed in the 2002 hearing. One witness relayed a message from a teenager in her community who implored regulators to “take OxyContin off the market,” and that if agencies could not or “will not, then please make a rule where there is much more supervision, regulation and control over it and change is so that it is not so addictive.”

This was 16 years ago, and things have only gotten worse. Since their introduction to the market, these drugs have led to“a 4.1 increase in the total number of deaths”from opioids. Studies reveal that thousands of heroin users began misusing prescription painkillers before they experimented with heroin.

In the 1960s, of those abusing opioids, “more than 80 percent started with heroin.” However, in the 2000s, 80 percent of Americans abusing opioids started with prescription painkillers, according to theNational Institute of Drug Abuse.

Ignoring these facts and figures, FDA has continued to approve evenmoreprescription narcotics. For example, despite opposition from 28 governors and 11 of 13 members on FDA’s own advisory committee, the agencyapproved in 2014 the release ofZohydro, ER,an extended-release prescription painkiller.

FDA hasn’t taken the dangers of opioids seriously, but, quite bizarrely, it has waged a completely unnecessary, inexcusable, anti-science war on vaping and e-cigarette products, which have been shown over and over to be effective tools people regularly use to quit using combustible tobacco products.

The basis of FDA’s opposition to THR products is that youth vaping supposedly leads to cigarette smoking. However, this is a false narrative, as a mountain of evidence shows. For instance, despite the fact vaping has become increasingly popular over the past decade, youth smoking has plummeted and is now at anall-time low.Further,researchshows restricting youth access to THR products actuallyincreasesyouth combustible cigarettes smoking.

Some FDA officials seem to think tobacco and e-cigarette companies aren’t doing enough to stop youth smoking, but for years, tobacco companies haveinvested millions of dollarsin youth prevention programs and millions more in smoking-cessation programs. JUUL Labs, one of the most recent scapegoats in the alleged “vaping epidemic,”has dedicated $30 millionto combat youth vaping, includinga $20,000 grant for an Illinois high schoolfor an “online intervention course developed specifically to address the e-cigarette epidemic.”

Perhaps most bewildering is that FDA refuses to acknowledge the reduced harm of THR products. The agency routinely uses data from the Royal College of Physicians (RCP) when analyzing the harms of combustible tobacco cigarettes, but it ignores RCP’s finding that electronic cigarette use“is unlikely to exceed 5% of the harm from smoking tobacco.”

If FDA wants to fulfill its goal of “protecting the children” and improving public health, it ought to address the opioid epidemic that it helped to create and has been devastating Americans for nearly two decades, and it should stop blocking THR products, which are unquestionably effective tools for those looking to quit using tobacco products.

Lindsey Stroud(lstroud@heartland.org)is a state government relations manager at The Heartland Institute.