So, We Know How the Old Dominion University Terrorist Got a Gun
Yes, This NYT Headline Is Real...and They Appear to Have a Muslim Terrorist...
We Got Some More Manpower Heading to the Middle East
CNN's Kaitlin Collins Set Up Scott Jennings Perfectly to Torch the Biden Administration
My Word, Ms. Spanberger, What Fresh Hell Is This Tweet?
Victory for President Trump’s DOGE – ACLJ Amicus Brief Affirmed
Our Long Road to War With Iran
Did We Avoid Another Terrorist Attack This Week? This Arrest in Texas Makes...
Globalize the Intifada? Authorities in the Netherlands Are Investigating Fire at Synagogue
What Can We Do About Islam in America?
More Questions Have Surfaced About Eric Swalwell's Eligibility to Run for California Gover...
Pete Hegseth Blasts Reports That the United States Did Not Plan on Iran...
All Six American Crewman Aboard Refueling Aircraft That Crashed in Iraq Confirmed Dead
Ex-Top Gun Pilot Says The Threat of Iranian Sleeper Cells 'Is Not a...
Even Obama's Former DHS Secretary Is Calling on Democrats to Fund DHS
OPINION

Will This Column Be Banned?

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Will This Column Be Banned?
AP Photo/Rogelio V. Solis

The Biden Administration has admitted, proudly admitted, that they are colluding with social media companies to flag content they consider to be misinformation so that those posts can be deleted and removed from circulation. 

Advertisement

In other words, the executive branch of the United States federal government is censoring our speech. 

Most insidiously, they aren't even leaving their fingerprints at the scene of the censorship crime. They are directing their toadies in Big Tech to do their dirty work for them. And Mark Zuckerberg (you know, the guy whose social media creation is "killing people") is gladly doing the bidding of his powerful pals. After all, that's literally how oligarchies work. 

Within days of the chilling boast, a sitting congresswoman was banned from Twitter for posting about Covid-19 and vaccine policies. 

Twitter claimed the tweets were "misleading" and tagged them with a disclaimer to that effect. 

Here's what she posted:  

"The controversial #COVID19 vaccines should not be forced on our military for a virus that is not dangerous for non-obese people and those under 65."

Here is what the CDC has tabulated regarding the Covid-19 deaths broken down by ages. 

Advertisement

Related:

COVID-19

And here is what the American Journal of Managed Care tells us about obesity and other similar medical factors related to Covid-19 dangers.

"With 6,000 vax related deaths and many concerning side effects reported, the vax should be a choice not a mandate for everyone."

Here is the CDC webpage reporting on over 6,000 deaths from individuals after they had received the Covid-19 vaccine. 

Then she posted this: 

"This is why no entity should force NON-FDA approved vaccines or masks. Instead help people protect their health by defeating obesity, which will protect them from covid complications & death, and many other health problems. We should invest in health, not human experimentation."

The Covid-19 vaccines have not been FDA-approved, they have been authorized under emergency conditions. Here are the facts (from the FDA) about that distinction.

Finally, here is what Harvard says about helping people protect their health regarding Covid-19 by overcoming obesity.

Advertisement

The congresswoman expressed her opinion based on available facts and information that anyone can obtain and absorb on their own. I just provided data from respected organizations (yes, even Harvard is reluctantly respected in certain contexts) that support the information the congresswoman expressed in her Tweets. 

The Biden Administration and their powerful allies in charge of social media platforms would tell you that steps to intercept the kind of opinion the congresswoman expressed were necessary to prevent people from being misled to health-related decisions that could put their lives in danger. 

They will rationalize their government-encouraged censorship as a life-saving act that is imperative lest a person read these dangerous, misleading words and do something that might put them in a position to contract the Covid-19 virus. 

They will tell us that because the congresswoman is an elected official and holds a position of influence and leadership, she has an extra responsibility to not use the social media platform in a way that the American public might be lulled into a false sense of complacency and security that they might act recklessly and get sick. 

I have provided you with objective data that supports the assertions the congresswoman made before she expressed her own opinion, informed by those facts. 

Advertisement

Now, ask yourself (before this column is banned as well), which tweet objectively resulted in more Covid-19 infections, the ones from the congresswoman who was temporarily banned from Twitter, or this one: 

As a footnote (because this sort of thing is very important to certain people), I have been vaccinated and so have my wife and my children. It was the right decision for me and for my family. We weighed the facts and the known risks and reached this personal health decision after much contemplation and prayer. I respect those who have done the same reflection and research and reached a different conclusion. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement