Mamdani Is Fundamentally Reimagining Violence
CBS News' 'Fact-Checks' of Trump's Address Ignore the Facts
The Presidential Address Has the Press Going on Defense...but They Seem Confused What...
Are Wisconsin Democrats in Full-Blown Panic Mode?
Maine Senate Race Shows Democrats Are Determined to Grant Illegal Aliens Amnesty
What Could Possibly Go Wrong With Mamdani's Plan for Free City-Run Babysitting?
United Airlines Is Offering Free Flight Changes for Customers Angry Over Trump's New...
Reject the Evil of Antisemitism!
Third Circuit Spikes New Jersey Ban on 'Assault Firearms' and Large Capacity Magazines
Everything Went Wrong for James Talarico This Week After His Epstein-Tied Backer Was...
Chinese Nationals Accused of Funneling $40 Million in Fraud Proceeds to Overseas Accounts
Dina Titus Campaign Under Fresh Campaign Finance Scrutiny While Carrie Buck Extends Cash...
Talks 'Have Not Stopped' Between United States and Iran Despite Strikes
Foul Play: Michigan Man Charged in Alleged Million-Dollar Sports Complex Fraud
Trump Demands Accountability As Canadian Wildfire Smoke Hits America
OPINION

What's So Bad about the Reid Plan?

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
What's So Bad about the Reid Plan?
The big sticking points between the House GOP leadership and Sen. Harry Reid’s latest plan are 1) the House wants two debt increases, one this year and one next year (Reid has just one increase) and 2) the House Republicans want a guaranteed balanced-budget-amendment vote. 
Advertisement


Regarding the Reid plan itself, it really looks like a Republican plan: A $2.7 trillion spending cut to raise the debt ceiling by something like $2.5 trillion, and no tax revenues. So, really, what’s so bad about the Reid plan? Increasingly, Wall Street gurus want one debt-ceiling increase, not two. 

The Reid package includes $1.2 trillion in discretionary-spending cuts and a small $100 billion savings in mandatory accounts, apparently from the Biden meetings, although it will not impact either health care or Social Security. 

There are other nicks and knacks from waste, fraud, and abuse, fees on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, revenues from spectrum sales, and some sort of farm-subsidy reform. And there is, of course, a huge $1 trillion piece from winding down the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. But that’s also in the budgets from Paul Ryan and the CBO. Interest savings come to $400 billion. 

Reid’s plan also includes a Mitch McConnell-like joint-congressional committee to find future savings. The committee’s recommendations will be guaranteed an up-or-down Senate vote without amendments by the end of 2011. 
Advertisement


The GOP House plan undoubtedly has more real spending reduction. Plus, the balanced-budget amendment, which makes it consistent with cut, cap, and balance. 

But the Reid no-tax piece is really important in terms of economic growth. At least things may not get worse on the tax front. 

Finally, all these plans hinge on tough enforcement for the spending caps. In particular, first-year 2012 savings, and then sequestration penalties. It just looks like the House and Senate are coming together.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement