How Joe Biden Was Once the GOP's Good Luck Charm for the Congressional...
Look Who's Surging in Alabama's Senate Race
Trump Blasts 'Radical Left Dumocrats' for Taking National Security Hostage Over FISA
Trump's State Department Is Cracking Down on This Birthright Citizenship Scam
'They Will Have to Pay the Price': Trump Just Put Iran on Notice
Fight the Nazi Hard!
Trump DHS Moves to Expedite the Deportations of Illegal Aliens Found to Have...
Spencer Pratt Responds to His Crushing Defeat in LA With a Mysterious Image
A New Age of Warfare: Downed Apache Pilots Rescued by Sea Drone
Gavin Newsom Has Finally Given His Endorsement for CA Governor
Go Bold, Bruce Blakeman, to Win New York State
Democrat Rep. Crockett Goes to Bat for Convicted Killer Karmelo Anthony
ICE Is Now Officially Fully Funded As Trump Signs 'Secure America Act'
EXCLUSIVE: Fight Against SNAP Fraud Intensifies With Latest Congressional Move
Man Who Murdered Ukrainian Woman on Charlotte Light Rail Ruled Incompetent to Stand...
OPINION

Too Many to Kill—Even for Us

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Too Many to Kill—Even for Us

Throughout history dictators, monarchs and other absolutists have enjoyed very little security. Few die peacefully in their bed. More often than not they are removed by forces either internally or externally in ways not pleasant.

Advertisement

Vladimir Putin today is trying to consolidate his position in Russia, which is hardly unassailable, but has been made stronger through the ineffectual counter moves of leaders in the West.

“It is astounding how easy democracies make it for us to reach our goal,” Hitler said about Neville Chamberlain and England in the 1930s.

Had the “democracies” stood up to Hitler before he had a chance to consolidate his power inside of Germany—say at Czechoslovakia—it’s likely that the generals inside Hitler’s Germany would have put a stop to his dictatorship.

But as victory piled up over victory, some diplomatic, others military, Hitler’s position became unassailable.

This is exactly the situation Vladimir Putin finds himself in.

Putin is adept at the political thrust and parry required to wield power in the Kremlin. As an internal security officer in the KGB, he rooted out dissent, amassed power and played the game well. As Colonel Sergei Tretyakov, a defector to the United States made clear in Pete Early’s book Comrade J, Putin and the men around him have no problem using murder against opponents both in Russia and on foreign soil, not in the pursuit of defense or forgone policy, but as a political weapon.

That there are forces in Russia today that still oppose Putin is only due to logistical considerations: As the now-head of Putin’s personal security forces, General Viktor Vasilyevich Zolotov explained after making up a list of potential assassination targets to dispose of politically “There are just too many. It’s too many to kill—even for us.”

Advertisement

Zolotov is important because there is speculation that Russia’s interior minister, responsible for state security, Vladimir Kolokoltsev, is or was on the chopping block.

Zolotov has been suggested as a replacement.

“Rumors that Kolokoltsev has been forced to resign first appeared Oct. 29 on Russia's Dozhd (Rain) television,” writes Stratfor, “and were picked up by Pravda, RIA Novosti and other Russian media outlets before becoming a topic of chatter for Russian pundits. Dozhd cited sources within the Defense Ministry, though the exact status of Kolokoltsev's position was not made clear.”

Since Kolokoltsev has appeared in public in his official capacity, he remains in place—for now, while Zolotov waits in the wings. But the mere mention of dissention at the top is an indication that Putin is: 1) not entirely secure; and 2) looking to further consolidate his power.

While Putin’s popularity has never been greater than it is right now thanks to his “Democratic” opponents helping him regain his balance after the blunder in Ukraine, power in Russia does not reside with the voters.

And although the sanctions against Russia are hurting the economy there, unless there is some viable alternative to Putin, his position is becoming stronger every day. The Russian economy eked out a gain of 0.7% in the latest quarter, which is more than twice the expectations of economists. And then there is China.

Advertisement

China is more than willing to play banker to Putin, to some extent making up for Western sanctions.

Today, it is clear, the U.S. is the main opponent for China, not Russia.

Historically, both Russia and China have shown a willingness to cooperate to further their own aims.

So while it’s not entirely accurate to paint the picture of Putin as a latter day Hitler or Stalin, it’s entirely plausible to see in him a little of both men.

Both men came to power incrementally because those in a position to stop them frankly failed to.

The fault in those cases certainly was internal, yet the forces of freedom could have helped themselves by effectual resistance.  In today’s instance it is also the fault of the “Democracies,” who do not lack the ability to stop Putin. They only lack the will.

Again.

History, as Mark Twain noted, never repeats itself, but it sure does rhyme.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement