Somewhere between the garage stacked with classified documents and the latest courtroom filing, Joe Biden decided the American people no longer deserved to hear his own words in full. On May 27, 2026, the former president sued the Department of Justice to block the release of audio recordings from his classified documents investigation — materials from interviews with ghostwriter Mark Zwonitzer in 2016 and 2017, conducted at his Wilmington home for his memoir, "Promise Me, Dad." The DOJ has scheduled those materials for release to Congress and the Heritage Foundation on June 15. Biden's lawyers argue this would amount to an unwarranted invasion of privacy.
After more than 54 years drawing a government paycheck — from the New Castle County Council through the Senate, vice presidency, and the White House — Biden has developed a sudden appreciation for personal boundaries. As a man who's built a career in private equity advising on fiduciary duty and regulatory compliance, I've watched enough depositions to recognize this posture. When a longtime public servant lawyers up to suppress audio of his own explanations, citizens have every right to ask what's on the tape.
The documented record makes a strong case for disclosure. Special Counsel Robert Hur's 388-page report, released February 2024, found Biden had "willfully retained and disclosed" classified materials after leaving office. No prosecution followed because Hur concluded a jury would likely view Biden as "a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory." The DOJ's own spokesperson stated the Biden team tried "to hide audio recordings that clearly demonstrate a significant decline in his cognitive abilities as far back as 2016." That statement, from Biden's own former department, is the clearest argument against sealing the tapes.
The evidentiary double standard is documented. FBI agents reportedly questioned probable cause for the August 2022 Mar-a-Lago search yet proceeded under DOJ leadership pressure. Internal emails suggest those supervisors did not "give a damn about the optics." The search warrant included deadly-force authorization language described as standard. Biden's classified materials were recovered from a Corvette's garage without comparable scrutiny. Special Counsel Jack Smith filed charges against Trump while Hur's team cited cognitive limitations as a material barrier to prosecuting Biden. Whatever one thinks of the legal merits, the procedural disparity is substantial.
Recommended
The statutory framework weighs against Biden's position. The Privacy Act of 1974 includes explicit carve-outs for records tied to official government functions. Under FOIA Exemption 6, courts apply a balancing test: privacy interests on one side, the public's legitimate interest in understanding government operations on the other. For elected officials, courts have consistently held that balance tips toward disclosure when records concern official conduct. Hur also found Biden had read classified notebook excerpts directly to Zwonitzer, the ghostwriter whose recordings Biden now wants suppressed. He isn't protecting medical records. He's fighting to suppress evidence of official conduct.
Taxpayers funded Biden's five decades in office. The Hur report documented Biden struggling to account for specific dates, facts, and the chain of custody for sensitive materials. That selective posture fits a broader pattern. The Biden DOJ pursued Trump aggressively while managing its own principal's problems with measurably less intensity. The current DOJ established a $1.776 billion Anti-Weaponization Fund to compensate those who contend they were wrongly targeted under Biden.
The remedies are concrete. Congress has the authority and the justification to demand immediate release of the Biden audio and transcripts. FOIA enforcement lacks adequate penalties for improper withholding — a gap that has enabled years of dilatory compliance. Legislation could close the loophole permitting former officials to invoke privacy protections over records generated during their official tenure. Each measure applies equally to former officials of either party.
As Justice Louis Brandeis observed, sunlight is the best disinfectant. After 54 years on the public payroll, Joe Biden doesn't get to close the curtain now. The American people paid for the performance. We deserve to hear the final act — unfiltered and unredacted. Anything less is privilege dressed up as principle.
Jay Rogers is a financial professional with more than 30 years of experience in private equity, private credit, hedge funds, and wealth management. He has a BS from Northeastern University and has completed postgraduate studies at UCLA, UPENN, and Harvard. He writes about issues in finance, constitutional law, national security, human nature, and public policy.
Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Townhall's conservative reporting that takes on the radical Left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.
Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member