A Nation That Won’t Take Risks Risks Everything
What Biden Doesn’t Want You to See at the Border
More of This, Please
Ian Sams Has a Brutal Day
The Second Longest 'Play'
The Problems With Net Zero
Bob Kennedy Needs Help
The DOJ’s Case Against Google Is Weak Sauce
DHS Funding Bill Would Displace Even More American Workers
Really? Nikki Haley and Tim Scott Get Into It Over 'Curtains'
'Honestly, Every Time I Hear You I Feel a Little Bit Dumber': Haley...
You Won't Believe How Many Democrats Want to Limit American's Freedom of Speech
Does This Mean Matt Gaetz Will Replace DeSantis As Governor of Florida?
This Is Who Tucker Carlson Will Be Interviewing During the Second GOP Debate
The Devastating Effects Border Patrol Agents Have to Endure Because of Joe Biden's...

Western Snowflakes and Russian Sabers

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
AP Photo/Alexander Zemlianichenko

Washington -- At the end of the Cold War, former President Ronald Reagan and his successor, President George H.W. Bush, were two happy statesmen. They had achieved their prized goal, an end to hostilities with the USSR. For that matter, the Russian President, Mikhail Gorbachev, and his successor, President Boris Yeltsin, were pretty happy, too. Gorby was perhaps less happy than his American counterparts, but he came around to accepting that the conclusion of hostilities between America and the USSR was not a bad thing. Gorby, you will recall, had objected when Reagan famously said, "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall." The wall being the Berlin Wall, and it separated East and West Berlin. Still, Gorby came to accept the end of hostilities between the USSR and the West, and his successor was clearly delighted by it. He was no longer going to be faced with bankrupting bills in his military budget -- just as Reagan had predicted.


I met Boris shortly after the wall came down. Before meeting him, I conferred with Bob Gates at his office at the CIA headquarters. Time spent with the cerebral head of our CIA was never time wasted. On that occasion, we had a wide-ranging talk, and among the points Bob made was that Russia was proud of its cultural achievements. It wanted them recognized. The Russians thought of themselves as part of the West.

Bob made the point that while American universities were ashamed of American history, Russia was proud of its history. With Bob in mind, I was quick to tell Yeltsin, as I chatted with him at the White House, that I had listened to a Sergei Prokofiev symphony and read "The Brothers Karamazov" in preparation for my evening with him and his Russian aides. I added that Russia's culture was a great culture and that it had contributed richly to Western culture. He smiled broadly. That was my pitch to be Bush's ambassador to Russia. George did not take the hint.

Now the Russians, under President Vladimir Putin, are again bellicose. Putin is responding to another aspect of his Russian culture. The historian Helene Carrere d'Encausse wrote of it in her magisterial work "The Russian Syndrome: One Thousand Years of Political Murder." The great historian goes on to write, "The history of Russia is first and foremost a continuous history of political murder." When she wrote that line, she was not thinking of Prokofiev or "The Brothers Karamazov," but she was thinking of Ivan the Terrible and Peter the Great and Lenin and Stalin.


I was also reminded of a Russian warship that almost sank in the Middle East during military exercises that were supposed to demonstrate to the West Putin's increased military prowess. There have been lesser mishaps surrounding the Russians' maneuvers, too. I believe the Russians are about as weak as they were at the end of the Cold War, but I am not so sure. Last week, when our 79-year-old president had his talk with Putin on the telephone, I hope he was forceful but politely reminded his Russian adversary of how the Cold War ended. Putin should not be rattling the saber once again. We are prepared for him.

Yet I am reminded of another thing that the great historian d'Encausse wrote in her monumental book on Russia. A great country never escapes its history. Russia has endured 1,000 years of bloody murder. Win, lose or draw, the Russians are a bloody-minded people. What have we endured? Well, we have endured some 250 years of nation-building, much of it inspiring. We have saved the civilized world at least twice. We have, in those 250 years, ushered in modern times, rendering a massive frontier and the most modern landscape on earth. In practically every one of the sciences, we have been a force for good, but now we come to the last few decades. Increasingly it is seen as the Era of the Snowflake. Particularly with the young men, it is the Era of the Snowflake. Oh, yes, and it is also the Era of the Woke Folk.


What is going to happen if the Snowflakes and the Woke Folks are confronted by 1,000 years of "political murder"? There are scholars studying the Snowflakes and the Woke Folks now, and they are convinced that they are studying the Infantilization of the West. I hope Putin has not been watching.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos