Stop the Presses! New York Times Bureau Chief Suggests That Obama is Incompetent

Posted: Jul 11, 2014 12:01 AM
Stop the Presses! New York Times Bureau Chief Suggests That Obama is Incompetent

WASHINGTON - If you watched MSNBC"s "The Daily Rundown" Monday, you might have been shocked to hear a panel of liberal journalists say some uncomplimentary things about Barack Obama's presidency.

With his job approval polls falling, the economy in first gear, incomes in decline, inflation on the rise, good jobs in short supply, and a thicket of administration scandals, the news media has begun to turn against Obama. And it isn't mincing words.

Carolyn Ryan, the New York Times Washington bureau chief, bluntly talked about "the national funk we're in, the sort of national malaise," as in Jimmy Carter-type malaise.

The foreign policy debacle in Iraq, where well-armed terrorist armies are close to bringing down its government, and "this crisis on the [Texas] border does go to this question of competence," Ryan said.

"I feel like it can be a negative for President Obama where it seems like so many things in this country just aren't working," she added.

NBC's chief political analyst Chuck Todd, the host of MSNBC's morning program, readily agreed. "Boy, you can see that 30-second TV ad, right? You start with the health care rollout, you go to the VA, you go to Syria, you go to Iraq, and you can go to the border. You can draw a straight line," he said.

Veteran USA Today analyst Susan Page said the tens of thousands of children coming into the country illegally from Central America threatened to hurt Obama with his core constituencies, especially Latinos, if he deals with the problem through mass deportations.

"This is a kind of a lose-lose for him, politically speaking," Page said.

Obama, who was in Texas Wednesday -- raising millions for his party's 2014 races -- where he met with Texas Gov. Rick Perry in Dallas, but decided not to go to the border to inspect the crisis first-hand, angering Democrats.

"This is a Katrina moment, right?" Page said. "You're going to a fundraiser, and you're not going to the border where there's this crisis?"

Washington Post chief political analyst Dan Balz said the crisis at the border was bad news for Obama and for Democrats.

"When we have seen these mass arrivals, it's hurt the party that's been in the White House, badly."

The Washington news media has become increasingly critical of Obama lately and the multiple troubles that have engulfed his presidency in his second term.

"The notion of Obama's incompetence in matters both foreign and domestic is really beginning to sink in with the press," writes longtime media critics L. Brent Bozell III and Tim Graham on their website.

"Try as they might in their daily attempts to sugarcoat the bad news and/or blame it all on the Republicans, even the liberal news media can read the tea leaves," they said.

But it wasn't only the media that was criticizing Obama. Democrats were doing it, too, over his decision not to visit the scene of the crisis for which he was asking taxpayers to cough up nearly $4 billion.

Obama's whirlwind fundraising tour not only took him to Dallas and Austin, a short flight from the border, but also to Denver where he drank beer and shot some pool with Colorado's governor.

"If he had time, with all due respect, to have a beer and play Colorado, then I think after the fundraisers he should go down there," Rep. Henry Cuellar, Democrat of Texas, told CNN.

Meantime, let's dispel the notion once and for all that is being fed by the White House, that the crisis took Obama by surprise.

Gov. Perry wrote Obama two years ago about growing numbers of unaccompanied children pouring across the U.S. border, demanding that he do something about it.

"By failing to take immediate action to return these minors to their countries of origin and prevent and discourage others from coming here, the federal government is perpetuating the problem," Perry told the president in May of 2012.

But Obama has based his entire presidency on hiding the truth about one issue after another -- from "if you like your health care plan you can keep it" to "al-Qaeda is on the run and their leadership is decimated."

Six million Americans had their health insurance plans cancelled because of Obamacare. Al-Qaeda's armies are now stronger and more lethal than ever before, spreading across Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, and at least half a dozen other nations in the Middle East and North Africa.

And the threat of terrorist attacks in the U.S. has grown far more serious this year, intelligence officials report.

This week, Obama was running around the country in an effort to stop his slide in the polls, declaring that under his presidency, the Obama economy has "made enormous strides."

Much of the news media went into a feeding frenzy over the 288,000 net new jobs that were created last month, declaring once more that it pointed to an "economic rebound."

But buried beneath the government's ballyhooed figures were statistics showing that Obama's "Swiss cheese" jobs report was loaded with low paying, part-time employment.

In a nation that hungers for good paying full time jobs, June's figures showed that the number of people in 35 hours or less jobs leaped by more than 1 million, to 27 million.

"What we're seeing is a growing trend of low-quality, part-time jobs," says Carrie Gleason who heads up the Fair Work Week Initiative that is lobbying for change in the nation's labor policies.

The rise in part-time work in the past half dozen years has for the most part been involuntary, as businesses cut payroll hours in response to Obamacare or other factors. Near the end of George W. Bush's administration, only 4.4 million Americans fell into this category. The number grew by 275,000 last month to 7.5 million.

Obama thought he could distract our attention from all this by creating the issue of "economic inequality," another kind of class warfare. Advisers say he's dropped that card trick because it drove down his polls.

The American people were not fooled.