Can You Feel the Excitement? Kamala Is Back and in the Lead!
The AI Race Needs a Little More ‘I’ in It
Dana Bash Recalibrates Both Sides of ICE Protest, and Sen. Cruz Is Guilty...
A Republican Who Wants to Raise Taxes
Welcome to the Old World Order
The Midterms: It's Not About 'Affordability' -- It's About Trump Hatred
Trump’s First Year Delivered the Most Meaningful Education Reforms in Decades
Pro-Abortion James Talarico's Factless Campaign for the Senate
How America First Policies Can Lead to Even More Growth in 2026
If You Own It, You Should Be Able to Fix It
Minnesota Malfeasance Is a Preview of Biden-Era Fraud and Waste
Why Children Under 13 Should Be Banned From Social Media
A Refreshing Year for LGBT Conservatives
Jury Convicts Alleged Minneapolis Gang Member in Fatal Gas Station Attack
Former TD Bank Worker Helped Launder $26 Million Through Shell Accounts, Prosecutors Say
OPINION

Mega Ships-Mega Trades-Mega Transfer of Wealth

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

The marvels of technology continue to boggle the mind and to change everyday lives. However, is there a tipping point where too much of a good thing doesn’t yield jobs or economic benefits? In fact, it might hinder job creation and limit broad economic benefits.

Advertisement

The CMA-CGM Benjamin Franklin, perhaps the world’s largest cargo ship will call Los Angles its home. It’s five times the size of the Titanic; these Chinese-made vessels are breathtaking.

  • 1,300 Feet-long
  • 177 Feet-wide
  • 197 Feet-high
  • 18,000 Containers
  • 27 Crew members

However, with only twenty-seven jobs, the ship is a technological marvel for sure, but how many jobs could have been created on such a ship a decade ago? Ironically, the Emma Maersk, once the world’s largest container ship, can get by with a crew of only 13 (it is apples and oranges, but the Titanic had a crew of 913). Perhaps the biggest subplot here is the amount of goods leaving China and other Asian nations for the United States and the west.

No nation was ever ruined by trade
-Benjamin Franklin

I am really shocked that political candidates from both sides of the aisle haven’t seized on the photographs of the Benjamin Franklin container ship as an example of the lopsided nature of free trade.

Some might see this as a reason not to trade at all, while others might think that the image is the perfect symbol for fairer trade.

Ironically, naming a cargo ship after Benjamin Franklin, a pivotal figure in our nation’s history, he got some things wrong, including the would-be national bird to his estimated value of economic output.

Franklin calculated economic value according to the amount of labor used into the production of that good. It’s easy to see how this might have been more plausible during Franklin’s time, but it’s easier to dismiss this line of classical economics. (It’s the same with Franklin’s choice of the national bird, as wild turkeys have a lot of attributes in a start-up nation such as America exhibited in its desire for independence.)

Advertisement

Related:

TRADE

With protectionism being bandied as a possible elixir for the nation’s economic health scenes of a cargo ship, which is the size of numerous football fields could be held as a sign of America’s weakness instead of its greatness. On one hand, if these ships are loaded with a bunch of cheap plastic stuff that’s made in Japan and cars from places that won’t allow U.S. imports-is it a true plus or are we squandering something more important?

We need better trade agreements and true access to the rest of the world. Those giant Ultra Large Container Vessels (ULCV) can’t just dump mountains of junk on our ports and leave us packed to the gills with our dollars.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement