Jamie Raskin's Low Opinion of Women
Thank You, GOD!
Trump Slams Bad Bunny's Horrendous Halftime Show
Federal Judge Sentences Abilene Drug Trafficker to Life for Fentanyl Distribution
The Turning Point Halftime Show Crushed Expectations
Jeffries Calls Citizenship Proof ‘Voter Suppression’ as Majority of Americans Back Voter I...
Four Reasons Why the Washington Post Is Dying
Foreign-Born Ohio Lawmaker Pushes 'Sensitive Locations' Bill to Limit ICE Enforcement
TrumpRx Triggers TDS in Elizabeth Warren
Texas Democrat Goes Viral After Pitting Whites Against Minorities
U.S. Secret Service Seized 3 Card Skimmers in Alabama, Stopping $3.1M in Fraud
Jasmine Crockett Finally Added Some Policy to Her Website and It Was a...
No Sanctuary in the Sanctuary
Chromosomes Matter — and Women’s Sports Prove It
The Economy Will Decide Congress — If Republicans Actually Talk About It
OPINION

Hail to the Chief, But Not the Spin

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

A part of President Obama's State of the Union (SOTU) address included taxes that will go well beyond punishing the rich. I think they are part of a wider attempt to right the injustices of yesteryear through saving caps and taxes on inheritance that may not have been available to all fifty years ago.

Advertisement

Using hatred and envy of the rich to unleash a torrent of new taxes is not a new ploy; torchbearers beware... taxes are a beast that can turn when unleashed.

Case in point: In 1966, U.S. Secretary of Treasury Joseph Barr, reported that “155” high-income households had paid zero in federal income taxes. This caused an uproar. By 1969, members of Congress received more letters about the "155" high-income households than the Vietnam War. Therefore, a new tax, the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) was created.

The AMT tax has been amended in recent years as it once threatened to hit as many as 33 million people; 4.5 million will have to pay and it will largely affect middle-class earners.

Now, President Obama wants to go after Individual Retirement Arrangements (IRAs) because three hundred or so super wealthy families, such as Mitt Romney's have socked away $25 million plus. To make the program fair, the most you will be able to save is $3.4 million, roughly $200,000 annually to live off of. I suppose with any more than that and you are just greedy.

The irony is, back in 1966, those wealthy families earned $200,000, it put them on top, but it would barely keep a family above water in New York City these days.

Advertisement

Another Reason Not to Own a Home

The estate tax is not just rich people's problem anymore. Soon, it is going to be a killer for the rich and the non-rich alike. Let's say your mom leaves you the house, it is worth $250,000, and later you sell it for $300,000. Today, your tax could be based on a $50,000 gain, but not if President Obama gets his way. If your mom and dad paid $50,000 for the house, your tax would be based on a gain of $250,000. It was a good way to soak in more dough and extract justice four years ago when it was harder for some Americans to buy homes.

Estate Tax New MathCurrent OptionSOTU Proposal
Mom & Dad PaidN/A$50,000
Worth Upon Death$250,000$250,000
Sell$300,000$300,000
Cap Gain Tax on Porperty$50,000$250,000
Talk about double taxation! First, an inheritance tax, and then, a capital gains tax that reaches back to parents and grandparents as if meting out social justice.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement