YouTuber Ms Rachel Just Cut a Campaign Check. Take a Wild Guess of...
Dems Know They Probably Should've Kept This Poll Private, Right?
Disbarred for Defending Trump: ACLJ Takes the Fight to the Supreme Court
New York Times Puts Brutal Dictator on Its Fashion List, Then Quietly Deletes...
Skynet Panic or Power Grab? Bipartisan Bill Would Let Government Shut Down AI...
Appeals Court Rejects Trump Administration's Efforts to Re-Detain Researcher Over Israel C...
USA Today Gets Tripped by Its Caitlin Clark Opposition. AP Weeps We No...
Thought Crimes Come to Minnesota
Long Island Residents Object to All-Boys Muslim Boarding School in Their Neighborhood
Freddy, Everyone's Favorite German Tourist, Bids America Farewell
Forcing Assisted Suicide Is Unconstitutional
Florida Financier Sentenced to 20 Years for Laundering Funds Tied to Haitian Assassination
Two Georgia Men Plead Guilty in $550,000 New York Film Tax Credit Scam
NM Woman Pleads Guilty in $3.9 Million Medicaid Transportation Fraud Scheme
Trump Demands Key 'Reconciliation 3.0' Step Passed Before August Recess
OPINION

Hail to the Chief, But Not the Spin

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Hail to the Chief, But Not the Spin

A part of President Obama's State of the Union (SOTU) address included taxes that will go well beyond punishing the rich. I think they are part of a wider attempt to right the injustices of yesteryear through saving caps and taxes on inheritance that may not have been available to all fifty years ago.

Advertisement

Using hatred and envy of the rich to unleash a torrent of new taxes is not a new ploy; torchbearers beware... taxes are a beast that can turn when unleashed.

Case in point: In 1966, U.S. Secretary of Treasury Joseph Barr, reported that “155” high-income households had paid zero in federal income taxes. This caused an uproar. By 1969, members of Congress received more letters about the "155" high-income households than the Vietnam War. Therefore, a new tax, the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) was created.

The AMT tax has been amended in recent years as it once threatened to hit as many as 33 million people; 4.5 million will have to pay and it will largely affect middle-class earners.

Now, President Obama wants to go after Individual Retirement Arrangements (IRAs) because three hundred or so super wealthy families, such as Mitt Romney's have socked away $25 million plus. To make the program fair, the most you will be able to save is $3.4 million, roughly $200,000 annually to live off of. I suppose with any more than that and you are just greedy.

The irony is, back in 1966, those wealthy families earned $200,000, it put them on top, but it would barely keep a family above water in New York City these days.

Advertisement

Another Reason Not to Own a Home

The estate tax is not just rich people's problem anymore. Soon, it is going to be a killer for the rich and the non-rich alike. Let's say your mom leaves you the house, it is worth $250,000, and later you sell it for $300,000. Today, your tax could be based on a $50,000 gain, but not if President Obama gets his way. If your mom and dad paid $50,000 for the house, your tax would be based on a gain of $250,000. It was a good way to soak in more dough and extract justice four years ago when it was harder for some Americans to buy homes.

Estate Tax New MathCurrent OptionSOTU Proposal
Mom & Dad PaidN/A$50,000
Worth Upon Death$250,000$250,000
Sell$300,000$300,000
Cap Gain Tax on Porperty$50,000$250,000
Talk about double taxation! First, an inheritance tax, and then, a capital gains tax that reaches back to parents and grandparents as if meting out social justice.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement