NH Gov. Chris Sununu Says Trump's Announcement 'Fell Flat' and Shares Why He...
House GOP Should Ban Earmarks
The Good Men and Women of the FBI
All I Want for Christmas Is Total Partisan Gridlock
Trump Exhaustion Syndrome
Biden's Misplaced Emphasis on One Gun
Biden Again Wants to Ban Semi-Automatic Guns. When Will Fact-Checkers Apologize?
'Prep-Fire' for the 118th Congress
The Question Fools Don't Ask
Media's Unhealthy Obsession With Elon Musk Comes Back to Bite Them
Networks Inexplicably Continue to Give Adam Schiff a Platform to Tantrum Over Kevin...
Is Biden Going to Campaign for Warnock Or Not? KJP Refuses to Answer...
Here's How Elon Musk Can Help Expose the Biden Admin's Collusion With Big...
Biden Steamrolls Unions, Asks Congress to Force Contract to Avert Rail Strike
New York Gun Law Keeps Getting Struck Down

DC Pols Can't Even Cut 3 Percent

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

I am absolutely amazed that nobody has put any of the proposed “fiscal cliff” spending reductions in the context of a simple percentage. 

We somehow get lost in the diatribe about the defense industry being devastated, how it will take years to receive a hip replacement, and that poor grandma may be forced to eat dog food.  The fools of both political parties just can’t stop spending, which apparently is the only way to be elected in this socialist driven country. 

The Budget Control Act of 2011, which is the driving force for the “fiscal cliff,” says that $1.2 trillion in specified cuts must be made over the next ten years

Not, I repeat, not all the cuts must be made in 2013. 

Therefore, our so-called leaders are forced to shave approximately $110 billion from the current budget, both defense and non-defense, over the next 12 months. 

Here’s where it gets interesting. 

Using President Obama’s budget for fiscal year (FY) 2013, the spending assumption was $3.8 trillion. 

Simple math would tell you that the cuts amount to less than 3% of the total declared budget.  This does not include any of the off-balance-sheet financing, like Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Fannie, and Freddie, etc. 

If you included these in the equation, the required cuts would be closer to 1%. 

If you factor against the built-in increases predicated on a so-called growing economy, the cuts would be well below 1%. 

Each and every day, American families are faced with harsh budgetary choices.  Because of raging unemployment, the housing sector debacle, and a myriad amount of other uncertainties, the general public does not have the luxury of approaching their boss and simply demanding more money. 

Therefore, daily decisions are made about maintaining a certain standard of living.  If you ask any of these families if they could reduce their expenses by 3%, they would more than likely laugh and say “is that all, just cut across the board.” 

Senator Patty Murray (D - Wash.) and Representative Jeb Hensarling (R-TX.) co-chaired a committee under the Budget Control Act of 2011.  With astonishing ineffectiveness, Murray, Hensarling, and their committee members could not find a way to cut less than 3% out of the budget. 

Instead, they all idiotically focused on taxes and they still do. 

For that level of inability, both Murray and Hensarling should either resign or be expelled immediately. 

In fact, the whole committee should have been fired, they’re all incompetent.  (Term limits definitely come to mind.) 

How out of touch with reality have our professed leaders become when they can’t find a measly 3% to cut in a budget? 

Understanding the true percentage rate begs the question: Does it really matter in the long run what comes out of Washington, D.C. in the next few days, or is it just theater reminiscent of the good old days of Y2K?             

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Video