Biden Bolts to Canada With No Plans to Visit East Palestine, Ohio
Even Democrats Find Testimony From TikTok CEO 'Preposterous'
Of Course Fauci Responded This Way to Biden's Inauguration
Here's the New Asylum Policy the US and Canada Adopted
Adios: Cuban Player Defects During World Baseball Classic
Here's Why I Identify As a Black San Francisco Resident
The One Person Who's Silent About Trump's Possible Indictment
Stanford College Republicans Names and Shames Students Who Intimidated School Dean
Nikki Haley Says It's Abusive for Trans Women to Use Female Bathrooms. She...
Mopping Up for Biden
Anti-Gun Protestors Arrested After Storming House Judiciary Hearing on Gun Control
World Athletics to Exclude Transgender Athletes From Women’s Events
Armed Russian Jets Flying Over U.S. Bases Prove Just How Weak of a...
ATF Torched Over New Rule That Turns Millions Into Felons
Transgender Athlete Wins NYC Women’s Cycling Event

He Called Me an Austrian

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of

Sometimes, it’s very difficult for me to understand the concept of austerity as defined by our world leaders. 

In my opinion, austerity seems to be very similar to the concept of productivity, and that’s an issue that I’ve struggled with since my days as a college freshman. 

My first year at George Washington University was highlighted by…..well; actually the second best highlight that year was having John Kenneth Galbraith as a guest lecturer.  I’m sure the famous Keynesian thought I was a dunce because I just couldn’t grasp how laying off 20% of the workforce was beneficial to the economy. 

Galbraith’s position was that by producing more with less, profitability soared. 

My confusion came in understanding how the unemployed could remain viable consumers in the economy. 

His response was those people who were out of work would find other jobs because jobs are always plentiful. 

Galbraith also said that while the unemployed were waiting to be hired, the government transfer program would go into full operation. 

I asked, “What if they were no jobs?”  He said that was a silly thought. 

I then proceeded to carry my thoughts even further and asked, “How could an unemployed person continue paying taxes, which was the lifeblood of the government?”  This was my line of thinking:

No job = no taxes, no taxes = no government revenue, no government revenue = more government borrowing, and on, and on, and on. 

As a Keynesian, Galbraith saw no problem with that scenario. 

In fact, he always said I was an Austrian. 

As a 17-year-old kid, I had no clue what he was talking about, and said “No, I’m from Upstate New York.” 

Here we are over fifty-years later, and Europe is talking about austerity, but it’s really the same concept as productivity. 

The governments are asked to raise taxes, cut employment, and reduce transfers such as pensions.  The theory suggests the greater the austerity, the greater the growth. 

Once again, just as the 17-year-old student that I once was, I’m very perplexed how anyone can believe that revenue can rise and growth be stimulated by cutting the workforce and taking away that which is being earned. 

Cutting fat is austerity, but the plan currently being bandied around not only slices muscle, but severs arteries and chops bones as well. 

When that happens, death follows. 

That fact is as true today as it was fifty-years ago, whether you’re a Keynesian or an Austrian. 

European austerity seems to fly in the face of common sense.  However, it seems that common sense is something that most world leaders of today are sorely lacking. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Video