Online Lib Lawyers: Dumb or Lying?
The Thing That Works
Those Defending the Nazi Candidate Want a Republican to Quit When Someone Else...
Experts Miss Trump's Enduring Presence in American Politics in Indiana Races
Keep Reality to Yourself
Networks Manufacture a Mini-Scandal Over a 'Road Trip'
Pass the Major Richard Star Act
The Hantavirus Cruise: A Ship of Fools
Fine Them, Jail Crooked Bosses, Revoke Their Nonprofit Status
Retirement Options for the Middle Class
Trump Is Addressing Grocery Gouging the Right Way. Democrats Aren’t.
America to DC: Stop Digging
Look Who Democrats Had To Bring Out To Help James Talarico
The Missouri Supreme Court Just Solidified a Republican Redistricting Victory
ICE Uncovered a Massive Immigration Fraud Scheme
OPINION

Geithner Has the hair, But He's No Model

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Geithner Has the hair, But He's No Model

When people hear the word “model” they instinctively think of a tall, graceful, female   marching down the runway as the music blares, the flashbulbs pop, and the audience gazes in awe. 

Advertisement

If you’re a Keynesian, however, the word “model” brings to mind something completely different. 

The day after the Federal Reserve’s announcement of Operation Twist and the financial market’s response to “significant downside risk,” the Keynesians are out in full force.  First, appearing on Bloomberg were two former Fed officials who applauded the Fed’s actions by saying it probably wouldn’t help, but if it could add a few hundred thousand jobs, then why not. 

When pressed as to how it would add those jobs, they responded by saying “many economist were consulted, and their models said it would happen.” 

Yeah, right

Next, we heard from analysts and pundits from Wall Street on CNBC, saying the action by the Fed created an overreaction and worldwide selling across the board in every asset class except treasuries. 

They also said this would obviously create a wonderful stock buying opportunity fairly soon.  Once again, when pressed as to why, the analysts and pundits reverted back to their standard response. 

Stating they observed their models over time “this is how we should respond.” 

Great advice! 

Finally, the man I’ve been waiting to hear from, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, chimed in by applauding the Fed’s actions and then condemning China for their currency, scolding the Europeans for not taking on more debt, and belittling Congress for its proverbial breakdown. 

Advertisement

As to why these things should be done his way, little Timmy put his hands out in his inevitable style, looked down, then looked up, and said over his elevated nose “the models said so.” 

Economic success is very simple to measure; it means more jobs and housing stability.  The success of the Keynesian models has continued to come up way short.  It doesn’t take an economist, a CFP, or even a young child who has few dollars to understand that absolutely none of the modeling has worked. 

Please, let’s all come to one conclusion. 

When you hear the term “model,” forget Keynes and think Tyra Banks.

Geithner has the hair for it, but he’s no model.     

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement