Alec Baldwin's Encounter With a Pro-Palestinian Activist Is a Warning to All
Senators Deliver Message to Biden on Schools Allowing 'Pro-Terrorist Mobs'
Here's How Sarah Huckabee Sanders Is Welcoming Education Secretary Miguel Cardona to Arkan...
Judge Clashes With Trump Attorney at Gag Order Hearing
CNN Once Again Delivers Media Malpractice From Gaza
Here's Who Trump Is Blaming for the Pro-Hamas Student Protests
Harvard Takes Action Against Pro-Hamas Student Group
Did Kristi Noem Complicate Her Chances for VP With This Sunday Show Abortion...
Biden's Crime Proclamation Sure Is Something
It's Been a Year Since the House Passed Rep. Greg Steube's Bill to...
Here's What Happened When a New York Homeowner Found Squatters on Her Property
Following Anti-Israel Protests, Columbia Switches to Hybrid Classes for the Rest of the...
Some of the Illegal Aliens DeSantis Sent to Martha’s Vineyard Will Be Permitted...
Biden’s ‘Ghost Gun’ Crackdowns Head to the Supreme Court
NBC's New 2024 Poll Is Mostly Good News for Trump, But...
OPINION

Geithner Has the hair, But He's No Model

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

When people hear the word “model” they instinctively think of a tall, graceful, female   marching down the runway as the music blares, the flashbulbs pop, and the audience gazes in awe. 

Advertisement

If you’re a Keynesian, however, the word “model” brings to mind something completely different. 

The day after the Federal Reserve’s announcement of Operation Twist and the financial market’s response to “significant downside risk,” the Keynesians are out in full force.  First, appearing on Bloomberg were two former Fed officials who applauded the Fed’s actions by saying it probably wouldn’t help, but if it could add a few hundred thousand jobs, then why not. 

When pressed as to how it would add those jobs, they responded by saying “many economist were consulted, and their models said it would happen.” 

Yeah, right

Next, we heard from analysts and pundits from Wall Street on CNBC, saying the action by the Fed created an overreaction and worldwide selling across the board in every asset class except treasuries. 

They also said this would obviously create a wonderful stock buying opportunity fairly soon.  Once again, when pressed as to why, the analysts and pundits reverted back to their standard response. 

Stating they observed their models over time “this is how we should respond.” 

Great advice! 

Finally, the man I’ve been waiting to hear from, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, chimed in by applauding the Fed’s actions and then condemning China for their currency, scolding the Europeans for not taking on more debt, and belittling Congress for its proverbial breakdown. 

Advertisement

As to why these things should be done his way, little Timmy put his hands out in his inevitable style, looked down, then looked up, and said over his elevated nose “the models said so.” 

Economic success is very simple to measure; it means more jobs and housing stability.  The success of the Keynesian models has continued to come up way short.  It doesn’t take an economist, a CFP, or even a young child who has few dollars to understand that absolutely none of the modeling has worked. 

Please, let’s all come to one conclusion. 

When you hear the term “model,” forget Keynes and think Tyra Banks.

Geithner has the hair for it, but he’s no model.     

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos