Inoculate Yourself Against Manipulation
VICE Posted a List on How White People Can Behave Better...and It's Unintentionally...
Smearing Capitalism
Deadspin Writer Targets a Child, CNN's Anti-Elon Crusade, Stelter's Fox Book Tanks in...
Team Biden's Double Quarter Pounder 'Misinformation' Campaign
Worrying About Joe Biden Getting 'Credit' on PBS
New York's Crisis Is a Lesson For Cities Everywhere
Laws Requiring Permission to Obtain Guns Look Vulnerable
Senator Cassidy and Graham’s CO2 Emissions Tax Will Be Expensive and Cause More...
Everything Is Political, Even Your Life Insurance
Widening Revolt Against Globalism
It Took UN Women This Long to Call Out Hamas for October 7...
When Congress Finally Passes Aid for Israel, Will It Come With Conditions?
Even After What We Know About Hostages, There's Still Been Some Terrible Takes...
It Looks Like Rep. George Santos Could Soon Be Expelled From Congress

Hooray for Democracy!

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of
AP Photo/John Locher)

There is occasionally good sense in just standing back and watching the grand spectacle known as democracy.

The presidential tryouts, known as the primaries, have been a strong prop of that reasoning. People who want, or say they want, to be president step on the stage and tell us why. They strut their stuff, for better or worse. They talk (almost interminably) about their challenging childhoods, the sacrifices their parents made on their behalf, the flash of inspiration that led them to the political trade. They lay out their strategic plans for the first 100 days after the inauguration.


And around we gather -- we the people of the United States, with iPhones for selfies, with cardboard signs, with hopes of pressing near enough to see, or even stick a hand in the direction of, the candidate.

And it works. That is the wondrous thing. Democracy of this sideshow sort -- in direct descent from the medicine wagons and step-right-up-there's of the carnival barkers -- works to sift out the sure losers (as distinguished from the less-sure ones) and splash the spotlight at last on the best-looking (from a success standpoint).

And from there, on to November...

A vast number of people in 2016 disliked the choices that democracy afforded us -- Hillary Rodham Clinton and Donald John Trump. I stood among that throng. Eventually, most of us came down in one camp or the other. The point was, democracy, as opposed to royal succession, had put these choices before us. There was nothing to do but choose.

Here we go again. The filtering-out process is working its magic. Way back there, we -- or, rather, the professed and practicing Democrats -- lost Robert Francis O'Rourke, aka Beto. He performed; we examined his teeth, felt his fetlocks. Hmm, not so much here, we concluded. Off to the pasture, Beto. Similar situations unfolded with Sens. Cory Booker and Kamala Harris, Julian Castro, Marianne Williamson and that nice Andrew Yang. Nice to have talked to you. Take care.

In the latest round of filtering, we bid farewell to Sen. Amy Klobuchar, Pete Buttigieg and Tom Steyer. None made a large impact on the capital-D Democratic electorate. Each -- even Steyer, with his call for (presumably taxpayer-funded) reparations for slavery -- had his or her say. The fetlock check failed in each case. I myself lean less toward dismissing them from sight and more toward thanking them for presenting the range of possibilities, in personality and program, that modern politics seems to indicate.


So, now: Bernie, Biden, Liz and Mike. We are getting somewhere. What kind of, and how much, government do the Democrats wish to lay on us? The likelihood is less than many -- Republicans and independents included -- have lately feared. Bernie, the anti-capitalist warmonger, is wearing us out with his implied promises of taking our money and spending it more intelligently than those who earned it could possibly do.

The issue in this election -- so our massive and messy media suggests -- is how do we get a president who doesn't tweet and rant every day? I don't think, from following the Democratic campaign, that this is really the case. The real question may be: Who best respects the right of honest labor, with the right to enjoy the fruits of that labor? Is it the earner, or is it something called "society"?

Not many (if any) Democrats have framed the matter thus. Sure. This is the tryout phase. They're trying out the idea that government can do more for us than we can do for ourselves -- and starting to receive sour looks for it, to the dismay of many party leaders and contributors. This is a helpful, as well as marvelous, thing to see and know.

Joe Biden senses opportunity. He sees Sanders and the angry left beginning to falter. The need for a sweeter song about opportunity and maybe even patriotism and honor and personal responsibility comes to mind. Maybe anger and shouts and finger jabs don't do the job that needs doing.


Hooray for democracy! This is how -- theoretically -- we strain out bad stuff, like socialism, before it poisons the system. It's working; it's working!

William Murchison is writing a book on moral reconstruction in the 21st century. His latest book is "The Cost of Liberty: The Life of John Dickinson."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos