They Knew: NBC News Reports Secret Service Knew About Rooftop Vulnerability Days Before...
Secret Service Has No Plans to Beef Up Security at RNC Following Trump...
The Media's Latest Spin Covering Trump's Assassination Attempt Shows They Don't Know What...
How Would You Rate Bill Maher’s Response to Trump's Assassination Attempt?
President Biden Addresses the Nation Day After Trump Assassination Attempt
Did Biden Just Say He Is Going to 'Make America Great Again' Following...
ICYMI: New Republic Justified Comparing Trump to Hitler Days Before Shooting
Biden Campaign Plans to Ease Off Trump Attacks
George Stephanopoulos Somehow Blames Trump for His Own Would-Be Assassination
Here's How the Race Between Trump and Biden Looks in the Battleground States
Why 'Reichstag Fire' Is Trending After Trump Attack
There's a New Update on Would-Be Trump Assassin
Report Reveals Enough Illegal Aliens Are Registered to Vote to Swing the Election...
World Leaders React to Trump Assassination Attempt
Democrat Expresses Disappointment that Would-Be Assassin Failed to Kill Trump
OPINION

The January 6 Committee Travesty

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

The Jan. 6 House committee just revealed how nakedly political it is. Forget protecting the nation. The committee's safeguarding the Democratic Party.

After conducting hundreds of depositions and closed-door hearings, committee staff were notified last week that most of their findings -- about domestic extremist groups and about law enforcement's failure to protect the Capitol -- will be excluded from the final report. All those investigations, paid for by taxpayers, are destined for the circular file. The committee's final report, due before the end of the year, will be about Donald Trump and nothing but Donald Trump.

Advertisement

A sensible decision, if the committee's only purpose is to cripple a possible future Republican presidential candidate. Trump's conduct that day was damning. But the committee's mandate was broader -- to ensure that the process of electing a president, and the Capitol itself, would be inviolate no matter who runs.

The committee's decision unmasks the big lie that tilted the election. In the months before the midterms, President Joe Biden and his media allies pummeled Americans with warnings that the nation is threatened by soaring right-wing extremism. The New York Times called it the country's "top domestic terrorism threat," citing the Department of Homeland Security. Biden warned that the survival of democracy is on the ballot in the midterms.

Some 44% of voters bought into the hysteria, according to an Associated Press survey, and hesitated to vote Republican, despite concerns about record-high inflation, crime and an overall conviction that the nation is headed in the wrong direction.

How serious could the threat have been if, once the election is over, the Jan. 6 committee puts aside concerns about right-wing domestic extremism? It was a lie all along.

The FBI manipulated data to make it look like right-wing extremists threatened America, according to whistleblowers cited by a House Judiciary Committee minority report.

FBI data keepers, pressured by their bosses, reclassified incidents as domestic terrorism. They also took each one of the many hundreds of Capitol rioters arrested and made separate case files located in the local FBI offices near the rioters' residences, even though the cases were being handled by the Washington, D.C., bureau. According to whistleblowers, that created the illusion of a vast nationwide threat, instead of a single incident in D.C.

Advertisement

Democratic pols and the media ran with these FBI-inflated statistics.

The New York Times editorial board ginned up fear on Nov. 3, claiming "incidents of political violence in the United States by right-wing extremists have soared."

The Times struggled to incriminate right-wing Republicans for the despicable hammer attack on Paul Pelosi, husband of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. The Times said the man accused in the crime "echoed their hatred of Nancy Pelosi," while at the same time conceding "it's not clear whether the man had links to any of them."

On Nov. 7, the Times warned that "the embrace of violent extremism by a small but growing faction of the Republican Party" puts democracy at stake.

Biden's FBI and other law enforcement agencies also heightened the fear, issuing alerts about election-related violence. They could cite no specifics. In fact, there were no incidents. Zero. The vaunted threat to democracy didn't materialize.

The nation has suffered from political violence. But it's inaccurate to claim it's a major threat or to blame only the Right. The bipartisan Center for Strategic and International Studies says that U.S. fatalities due to domestic political violence average 31 per year, a "relatively small" number. Nineteen deaths were linked to the two weeks of rioting following George Floyd's murder.

These death tolls pale beside the 25,000 homicides yearly in this country. Crime, and pro-crime policies favored by Democrats, are the real threats to our safety.

Advertisement

The Jan. 6 committee should do its job, providing undoctored data and an accurate perspective on how much of a threat political extremism is in this country.

Instead, the committee's putting aside two years of costly investigations, before the public sees the results, to spend the final weeks of Congress on a sideshow over whether Trump will testify.

What a travesty.

Sponsored

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos