Only a Democrat Could Think This Was a Top Issue Concerning the Israel-Hamas...
How the Liberal Media Is Coping With Trump's Historic Level of Black Voter...
Here's the Part of Dr. Phil's Trump Interview That Would Probably Make Libs...
Climate Lunatics Vandalize Stonehenge
Former Obama Fundraiser Ditches Dems to Back Trump
'What a Joke': Republicans Blast NY Magazine Cover Story on GOP Women
Dem Strategist Fact-Checked Live on CNN and It Was *Chef's Kiss*
Hawley Grills Boeing CEO in an Exchange Even the Left Is Praising
Democrats and Their Allies Sure Are Increasing Their Attacks on SCOTUS
Surreal Gaslighting: Team Biden and 'News' Media Collude on Insulting 'Cheap Fakes' Lie
John McGuire Is Claiming Victory, but Bob Good Isn't Giving Up in Too...
A Florida Public School Employee Allowed Her Son to Play Girls’ Sports. Here’s...
Democrats in Disarray Over Boycotting Netanyahu's Speech
Is Biden Responsible for Alvin Bragg's Prosecution of Donald Trump?
'Truly Unprecedented': Human Smuggling Attempts Are Escalating in This Unlikely Sector

Court allows 'Jesus prayers' to be banned

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of
NEW YORK (BP) -- The Supreme Court will not intervene in a controversy over Christian prayers delivered before commission meetings in Forsyth County, N.C.

The North Carolina chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union and Americans United for Separation of Church and State praised the decision as a victory for the First Amendment.


The high court's decision Tuesday (Jan. 17) leaves in place a federal appeals court ruling that held that the predominantly Christian prayers at the start of commission meetings violated the First Amendment.

The court found that more than three-quarters of the 33 invocations given before meetings between May 2007 and December 2008 referred to "Jesus," "Jesus Christ," "Christ" or "Savior."

That, according to the court, was a problem.

"Faith is as deeply important as it is deeply personal, and the government should not appear to suggest that some faiths have it wrong and others got it right," Fourth Circuit Judge J. Harvey Wilkinson wrote in the July 29 court ruling. The three-judge panel split, 2-1.

Americans United Executive Director Barry Lynn hailed the Supreme Court's decision not to consider the case. His organization was one of the groups sponsoring the lawsuit.

"When government meetings are opened regularly with Christian prayer, it sends the unmistakable message that non-Christians are second-class citizens in their own community," Lynn said in a statement. "That's unconstitutional, and it's just plain wrong."

But David Cortman, an attorney representing Forsyth County, said the ruling makes Christians second-class citizens.

"That's what this case shows," said Cortman, an attorney with the Alliance Defense Fund. "We believe the Supreme Court has missed an opportunity to clear up the differing opinions among the various circuit courts. It really is disappointing."


The decision means prayers are still allowed, but the county must police the words to make sure one faith group is not represented over another faith group.

"America's founders never shied away from referencing the God to whom they were praying when offering public invocations; the citizens of Forsyth County should have this same opportunity," Cortman wrote in a statement. "No federal court has ruled that prayers cannot be offered before public meetings."

Todd Starnes is host of Fox News & Commentary, heard daily on Fox News Radio stations around the nation. He is the author of "They Popped My Hood and Found Gravy on the Dipstick" and "Dispatches From Bitter America." This article first appeared at Used by permission. With reporting from the Associated Press

Copyright (c) 2012 Southern Baptist Convention, Baptist Press

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos