Australia Is What Happens When You Disarm Your Citizens
Oh, We Know What the Brown University Shooter Reportedly Said Before Opening Fire
To the Shock of No One, Australian PM Says Bondi Terrorists Motivated by...
If You Were Hoping That Trump Would Tone Down His Remarks on Rob...
Nice Try, Dems, But Your Little Stunt Against Kristi Noem Last Week Imploded...
When One Seeks Updates on the Brown University Shooting, It Shouldn't Devolve Like...
Watch a Reporter Call Out the Authorities During the Last Brown University Shooting...
It’s Not Hard to NOT Be a Jerk
Wisconsin's Supreme Court Just Handed Catholic Charities a Major Win (and Dealt a...
The November Jobs Numbers Are Here, and It's Good News for American Workers
The Left Pivots Away From 'Islamophobia' With New Euphemism for People Who Notice...
USA Today Journalist Doubles Down on 'Appeal to Heaven' Ignorance
After Failing to Engage Bondi Beach Terrorists, Guess Who the Australian Police Did...
This Is What 'Globalize the Intifada' Looks Like: Orthodox Jews Attacked on NYC...
The U.S. Just Conducted Another Lethal Kinetic Strike on Narco Boats
Tipsheet

Federal Judge Rules Virginia's Same-Sex Marriage Ban Unconstitutional

A federal judge ruled that same-sex marriage bans enshrined in the Virginia Constitution and Code are unconstitutional, directly violating both the Due Process Clause and the the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Advertisement

U.S. District Court Judge Arenda Wright Allen wrote in her opinion Thursday:

Justice has often been forged from fires of indignities and prejudices suffered. Our triumphs that celebrate the freedom of choice are hallowed. We have arrived upon another moment in history when We the People becomes more inclusive, and our freedom more perfect.

The commitment to love and support another person enriches society, Allen claimed:

Although steeped in a rich, tradition-and faith-based legacy, Virginia's Marriage Laws are an exercise of governmental power.

Two sets of single-gender couples living in Virginia filed the complaint. The plaintiffs sought “relief from the imposition” of Article I. Section 15-A of the Virginia Constitution, which defines marriage as being:

That only a union between one man and one woman may be a marriage valid in or recognized by this Commonwealth and its political subdivisions. This Commonwealth and its political subdivisions shall not create or recognize a legal status for relationships of unmarried individuals that intends to approximate the design, qualities, significance, or effects of marriage. Nor shall this Commonwealth or its political subdivisions create or recognize another union, partnership, or other legal status to which is assigned the rights, benefits, obligations, qualities, or effects of marriage.

Advertisement

Related:

VIRGINIA

Plaintiffs also sought freedom from Sections 20-45.2, 20-45.3 of the Virginia Code which voids civil unions or contracts created between same sex couples in another state.

National Organization for Marriage President Brian Brown said he hopes the Supreme Court will reverse the decision:

This is another example of an Obama-appointed judge twisting the Constitution and the rule of law to impose her own views of marriage in defiance of the people of Virginia.

USA Today crafted a map revealing that same-sex marriage remains banned in most states:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos